Rotational Motion FInding the total ENergy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final velocity of a ball rolling off a table and down a ramp, using principles of energy conservation. The initial gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy are computed, with values provided for each type of energy. Participants confirm that energy conservation applies, allowing the sum of initial energies to equal the sum of final energies. There is a mention of the need to incorporate rotational kinetic energy using the moment of inertia and the relationship between linear and angular velocity. The final calculated velocity is approximately 3.85 m/s, indicating the calculations are on the right track.
Schu
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Particulars:
ball has a radius of 2.5 cm a mass of .125 and is rolling across a table with a speed of .547 m/s, this table is 1.04 m off the ground. It rolls to the edge and down a ramp How fast will it be rolling across the floor?

First I found the Gravitational Potential Energy: Ep=mgh
Initial of 1.2753 FInal = 0

THen the Linear Kinetic ENergy : 1/2 mv^2
Initial .0187005625 FInal .0625v^2

Elastic Potential Energy: .5k(delta)x^2
0 0

Rotational Kinetic Energy: 1/5mv^2
initial .007480225 FInal .025v^2

Now I need to bring them all togther and solve the final velocity.

Is the Sum of the inital energy's = to the SUM of the final energy's?
If that's true then 1.30148075 = .0875v^2
so v = 3.85 m/s
Is that at all right?? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I need help ASAP

Is anyone out there?

I would appreciate the help :confused:
 
Looks ok to me. (I got 3.86 m/s, by rounding off)
 
rotational KE

I didn't check your arithmetic, but I have some comments.
Schu said:
Rotational Kinetic Energy: 1/5mv^2
The rotational KE is {KE}_{rot} = 1/2 I \omega^2.

You will also need the "rolling condition": V = \omega R.
Is the Sum of the inital energy's = to the SUM of the final energy's?
Yes, if you assume energy is conserved, which seems reasonable for this problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top