Rotational Motion Problem (a bike)

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between the angular speed of a bicycle's rear wheel (Wr) and the front sprocket (Wf) can be derived using the number of teeth on the sprockets. The initial attempt led to a complex formula, but it was clarified that the ratio Wr/Wf simplifies to the ratio of the number of teeth, specifically Wr/Wf = Nf/Nr. This indicates that angular velocity is directly proportional to the number of teeth on the sprockets. The confusion arose from unnecessary substitutions involving circumference, which were deemed irrelevant to the core relationship. The final conclusion is that the angular speed ratio is straightforwardly determined by the teeth count on the sprockets.
Carpe Mori
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How is the angular speed of the rear wheel (Wr) of a bicycle related to that of the pedals and front sprocket (Wf)? That is derive a formula for Wr/Wf. Let Nf and Nr be the number of teeth on the front and rear sprockets respectively. The teeth are spaced equally on all sprockets so that the chain meshes properly. Then evaluate the ratio of Wr/Wf when fron and rear sprockets have 52 and 13 teeth respectively


Homework Equations



W = v/r

Circumference (c) = 2pi*r (i am not sure if this is relevant)

The Attempt at a Solution



v for both front and back sprocket is the same (note W is not)

Wf = v/Rf

Wr = v/Rr

Since distances between teeth are same in back and front:

C = 2pi*Rr/Nr = 2pi*Rf/Nf

so...

Wr = v/(Nr*Rf/Nf*Rr)

Wf = v/(Nf*Rr/Nr*Rf)

Wr/Wf = Nf^2*Rr^2/Nr^2*Rf^2

but i do not think that is right because the question implies that your only variable should be N...

HELP! (if i seem unclear about anything...do tell)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations for angular velocity look sound. I think your confusion starts when you substitute: C = 2pi*Rr/Nr. That to me doesn't make much sense. I would agree that the circumference C = kNr, where k is the spacing or pitch (some constant) of the teeth. And C is also equal to C=2pi*Rr. Which would lead to Rr being expressed in terms of Nr.

Give that a try.
 
mezarashi said:
Your equations for angular velocity look sound. I think your confusion starts when you substitute: C = 2pi*Rr/Nr. That to me doesn't make much sense.

Nr/(2pi*Rr) is just the number of teeth per unit length, and so would be the same on both. He has just taken the reciprocal, which is constant C.

Carpe Mori said:
Wr = v/(Nr*Rf/Nf*Rr)

Wf = v/(Nf*Rr/Nr*Rf)

Wr/Wf = Nf^2*Rr^2/Nr^2*Rf^2
What is all this? Number of teeth on each is proportional to the circumference and hence the radius. Find Wr/Wf as some ratio of Rr and Rf and then put Nr and Nf in the ratio.
 
well i took my C = 2pi*Rr/Nr = 2pi*Rf/Nf and solved for both Rr and Rf and then plugged those values into my initial angular velocity equations.

and i resulted with

Wr/Wf = Nf^2*Rr^2/Nr^2*Rf^2

is this correct yes or no?? it means angular velocity depends on both Radius and number of teeth of both sprockets...which makes sense to me
 
Carpe Mori said:
well i took my C = 2pi*Rr/Nr = 2pi*Rf/Nf and solved for both Rr and Rf and then plugged those values into my initial angular velocity equations.

and i resulted with

Wr/Wf = Nf^2*Rr^2/Nr^2*Rf^2

is this correct yes or no?? it means angular velocity depends on both Radius and number of teeth of both sprockets...which makes sense to me

I don't know. You check it once more. But I'll show you the easy and natural way.

v = Rf*Wf = Rr*Wr =>
Wf/Wr = Rr/Rf = 2pi*Rr/2pi*Rf = C*Nr/C*Nf = Nr/Nf =>
Wr/Wf = Nf/Nr.

There was no need to introduce the C, since it's obvious that the number of teeth is directly proportional to the radius.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top