Rotational motion, Pulley system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a pulley system with a 5kg and a 10kg mass. The calculated speed of the masses when they pass each other was initially found to be 1.8 m/s, but it was suggested that using energy conservation principles would yield a more accurate speed of approximately 1.11 m/s. The torque exerted on the pulley was calculated as 4.9 Nm, which was confirmed to be correct. The importance of considering mechanical energy conservation in such problems was emphasized for accurate results. Overall, the discussion highlights the need for careful application of physics principles in solving rotational motion problems.
zames99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 5kg mass and a 10kg mass are connected by a rope and hung over a pulley. The pulley is a disc with a mass of 5kg and a radius of 10cm. the two masses are initially at rest with the 10kg mass 50cm higher than the 5kg mass.
Find, The speed of each mass at the instant they pass one another
The torque exerted on the pulley by the masses
The angular momentum of the pulley at the instant the masses pass one another.

Homework Equations


L = m(r * v)
T = r * F
I(disc) = 1/2 mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Part (1)
F=(10-5)*9.8 = 49N
Mtotal = (10+5)=15
a =49/15 =3.26 ms^-2
v^2 = 0^2 + 2 * 0.5 * 3.26
v = 1.8 m/s

Part (2)
The only external forces acting on the disc are m1*g and m2*g
T = r * F
T = r (m2*g-m1*g)
T = 0.1 (10*9.8-5*9.8)
T = 4.9 Nm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer to part 1 does not look correct. Assuming no frictional losses, you may find it helpful to equated the mechanical energy (i.e. the sum of potential and kinetic energy) of the three masses before they are released with the mechanical energy of the system when the two masses pass each other. Doing that, you should arrive at a speed around 1.11 m/s.

Your answer to part 2 looks correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
859
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top