Rubber wheel (angular acceleration)

AI Thread Summary
A small rubber wheel with a radius of 2.0 cm and an angular acceleration of 7.2 rad/s² drives a larger pottery wheel with a radius of 25.0 cm. The angular acceleration of the pottery wheel is calculated to be 0.576 rad/s², which is 1/12.5 of the rubber wheel's acceleration due to their radius ratio. The time required for the pottery wheel to reach a speed of 65 rpm is approximately 22.5 seconds. The discussion emphasizes that while torque magnitudes are proportional to the radii, the net torque on the small wheel includes additional driving torque from a motor. Understanding the moments of inertia of both wheels is not necessary for solving the problem at hand.
FossilFew
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
A small rubber wheel is used to drive a large pottery wheel, and they are mounted so that their circular edges touch. The small wheel has a radius of 2.0cm and accelerates at the rate of 7.2rad/s^2 and it is in contact with the pottery wheel (radius 25.0cm) without slipping. Calculate:
a) the angular acceleration of the pottery wheel
b) the time it takes the pottery wheel to reach its required speed of 65rpm


My approach:
What I can determine with the rubber wheel:

0.02m = r
7.2 rad/s^2 = angular acc

Atan= (0.02)(7.2) = .144 m/s^2

I think the Atan is the radial acceleration for the pottery wheel but I'm not sure.
If I can get the angular acceleration I can solve for t using Wot + 1/2 (angular acceleration) t^2 = theta ( I think).

If I assumed Atan was the radial acceleration I attempted to solve for w in Radial Acceleration= w^2r w = 0.76m/s

I'm not sure what to think of my approach. The key is what type of acceleration is transferred from the rubber wheel to the pottery wheel?

Thanks in advance. This forum is great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angular displacement of the big wheel is proportional to the angular displacement of the small wheel. That means the angular velocities and accelerations are also proportional with the same ratio. How many radians does the big wheel rotate when the small wheel rotates one radian?
 
So R2 is 12.5 times the radius of the rubber wheel. This means that the angular acceleration of the second wheel is 1/12.5 the given angular acceleration of the rubber wheel? This also means the torque on the second wheel is 12.5 times the torque on the rubber wheel?

Does this sound correct?

Thanks.
 
FossilFew said:
So R2 is 12.5 times the radius of the rubber wheel. This means that the angular acceleration of the second wheel is 1/12.5 the given angular acceleration of the rubber wheel? This also means the torque on the second wheel is 12.5 times the torque on the rubber wheel?

Does this sound correct?

Thanks.
Your conclusion about the torque applies only to the magnitudes of the torques the wheels exert on one another. By Newton's third law they must apply equal and opposite forces upon one another, so the torques would be in proportion to their radii. The net rorque on the small wheel includes some driving torque from a motor that has to overcome the torque from the big wheel to accelerate the small wheel. You would need to know the moments of inertia of both wheels to analyze the torques in the problem. You do not have this information. Fortunately, you do not need it. This prolem is not about the torques on the wheels.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top