How Long Should a Gravel Ramp Be to Stop a Runaway Truck?

AI Thread Summary
Truck brakes can fail due to overheating, prompting the need for gravel ramps in mountainous areas to safely stop runaway trucks. The discussion focuses on calculating the appropriate length of a gravel ramp with a 6.0° slope and a coefficient of friction of 0.46 for a 10,000-kg truck entering at 35 m/s. The initial approach to the energy equations was flawed, particularly in how kinetic energy, potential energy, and work were related. A revised equation, K_i = U_f + W, correctly accounts for the conversion of kinetic energy into potential energy and work done by friction. This adjustment leads to a proper understanding of the ramp's length needed for effective stopping.
LinearBeat
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Truck brakes can fail if they get too hot. In some mountainous areas, ramps of loose gravel are constructed to stop runaway trucks that have lost their brakes. The combination of a slight upward slope and a large coefficient of friction in the gravel brings the truck safely to a halt. Suppose a gravel ramp slopes upward at 6.0° and the coefficient of friction is 0.46. Use work and energy to find the length of a ramp that will stop a 10,000-kg truck that enters the ramp at a speed of 35 m/s (75 mph).

F_f=Force of Friction (F_f=μF_n; F_n=Normal Force)
m=Mass of the truck
U=Potential Energy, U-i= initial U, U_f=final U
L=Length of the ramp
K=Kinetic Energy, K_i=initial K, K_f=final K
W=Work (in this case done by friction)
v=initial velocity of the truck

Looking at the diagram I drew I determined:
F_f=μmg/cosθ
U=Lsinθmg

ΔK=ΔU-W
K_f-K_i=U_f-U_i-W
-K_i=U_f-W
-1/2mv^2=Lsinθmg-(μmg/cosθ)L
-1/2v^2=L(sinθg-μg/cosθ)
-v^2/(2(sinθg-μg/cosθ))=L

Using this process I've gotten the wrong answer, but I don't understand what I've done wrong and how I need to revise it.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the problem may lay in your equation where you related energies.

Your statement -K_i=U_f-W is saying that all of the initial kinetic energy is being transformed into work, except for the potential energy that is being gained (dividing through by a negative gives K_i=W-U_f). This is also saying that initial kinetic plus initial gravitational results in the work done by friction, which seems incorrect.
 
Okay so that's a great way to evaluate my original statement. The way I understand it, the kinetic energy that the truck has will all be converted into potential energy and work. So I think a better equation is:
K_i=U_f+W
Using Villyer's method I think this equation holds up; the kinetic energy minus the work should equal the potential energy and the kinetic energy minus the potential energy should equal the work.
and the verdict is...
Correct!
Thanks so much Villyer.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top