Saving Time with Different Flight Routes and Wind Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter leafs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Plane
leafs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A passenger has to options to get to his desired city. The cheaper option is to travel 1200km east, then catch a connecting flight with a 30 min stop over that would take him 350km south. The expensive option is to fly directly to the city. If all three airplanes travel at 345km/h, and the wind is a constant 45km/h (S35degrees W), how much time does the passenger save by taking the expensive option?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I can't come up with a solution. I don't know what to do
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the problem wants you to assume the Airplanes have that speed relative to the air that is itself moving; if so, you need to subtract the projection of the wind velocity along the flight direction and that is going to give you the actual speed for each specific flight (that makes a particular angle of its own with the wind velocity) in the Earth frame. Including the stop time, you need to figure out the time (having found the velocity) for each specific flight and figure out the total for the two routes. You also need to assume that people seating next to you are reasonably normal, otherwise the real life answer is going to be much longer in extent..
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top