Schrodinger equation for step potential

Abdul.119
Messages
73
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider the one-dimensional Schrodinger equation for the step potential, that is for U(x) = 0 for x<0, and
gif.gif
for
gif.gif
,
gif.gif
. Consider a particle with mass m and energy E < U. Assume the particle is initially at x<0.

a) Calculate the penetration depth Δx at which the probability density of the transmitted wave "decayed" to half the value that it has at x=0.

b) Apply your result of part a) to an electron inside a metal block for which the work function is 4 eV.

c) Apply your resilt of part a) to a "macroscopic" particle with mass m=10^-15 kg and velocity v=10^-2 m/sec. Assume a barrier height that is 1.5 as high as the kinetic energy of the particle.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea where start with this one, I have a clue on how to find the transmission and reflection probabilities but I am not sure this is relevant for finding Δx. In this question are we suppose to use the equation Δp Δx >= ħ/2π ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question does not ask you to calculate transmission probabilities. Just write down the form of the wave function for x > 0.
 
PietKuip said:
The question does not ask you to calculate transmission probabilities. Just write down the form of the wave function for x > 0.

For x>0 I believe the wave function would be u(x) = Ae^(ikx)
 
So imaginary k will give you the decay. Adjust with a factor ln(2).
 
PietKuip said:
So imaginary k will give you the decay. Adjust with a factor ln(2).

I don't quite understand what you mean by adjust by a factor of ln(2). Also still not seeing how k will help find penetration depth Δx
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top