Screwed joint - free body diagram

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the deflection of a square beam with screwed joints at both ends under a uniformly distributed load. It highlights the complexity of screw joints, which have three force reactions and two moment reactions, contrasting them with fixed joints that have three of each. The conversation suggests that most joints are semi-rigid rather than simply supported or fixed, necessitating careful assumptions based on connection types. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of considering connection details and the reliability of the joint when analyzing load support. Overall, the analysis of deflection requires a nuanced understanding of joint behavior and assumptions.
tihort
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a square beam with a screwed joint at each end. I am trying to determine deflection under a uniformly distributed load.


Homework Equations



- What is a simplified form for the screwed joint? Is it to be assumed fixed at both ends?


The Attempt at a Solution



- The screw joint has 3 force reactions, and 2 moment reactions. A fixed joint has 3 forces and 3 moment reactions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tihort said:

Homework Statement



I have a square beam with a screwed joint at each end. I am trying to determine deflection under a uniformly distributed load.


Homework Equations



- What is a simplified form for the screwed joint? Is it to be assumed fixed at both ends?


The Attempt at a Solution



- The screw joint has 3 force reactions, and 2 moment reactions. A fixed joint has 3 forces and 3 moment reactions.

Homework Statement



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

In actuality, most joints are neither simple nor fixed, but somewhere in between (semi-rigid). Some assumptions may have to be made depending on the type connection and connection arrangement. A steel I beam, for example, is often framed into a column using clip angles welded or bolted to the webs, which are in turn bolted to the column with multiple bolts; for analysyis and deflection purposes, due to angle defornations, the beam is considered simply supported. Do you have a sketch of your connection detail? Would you trust the connection at one end to support a cantilevered load with no support at the other? If not, think simple.
 
PhanthomJay said:
In actuality, most joints are neither simple nor fixed, but somewhere in between (semi-rigid). Some assumptions may have to be made depending on the type connection and connection arrangement. A steel I beam, for example, is often framed into a column using clip angles welded or bolted to the webs, which are in turn bolted to the column with multiple bolts; for analysyis and deflection purposes, due to angle defornations, the beam is considered simply supported. Do you have a sketch of your connection detail? Would you trust the connection at one end to support a cantilevered load with no support at the other? If not, think simple.

Thank you very much PhantomJay!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top