Engineering Second Order Laplace Trasform For RLC Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the differential equation for an RLC filter circuit and calculating its Laplace frequency response. The differential equation derived is Vi(t) = LC(Vo(t))'' + RC(Vo(t))' + Vo(t). The Laplace transform leads to the expression H(s) = Vo(s)/Vi(s) = 1/(1 + RCs + LCs^2), with specific values for RC and LC provided. The magnitude of the frequency response at Wc = 1/sqrt(LC) is calculated to be |H(s)| = 0.25. The correctness of the assumptions regarding initial conditions and the nature of s as a complex number is also questioned.
MathsDude69
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The circuit below (please see attactment) shows an RLC filter circuit whereby RC = 1/2 and LC = 1/16. Determine the differential equation that describes the relationship beween the input voltage Vi(t) and output voltage Vo(t). If the initial conditions of the capacitor and inductor are zero, determine the laplace frequency response H(s) = Vo(s)/Vi(s) of the filter and calculate the magnitude of |H(s)| s=jWc at the frequency Wc = 1/sqrt(LC).


Homework Equations



KVL

The Attempt at a Solution



So I've worked out the differential equation as:

Vi(t) = LC(Vo(t))'' + RC(Vo(t))' + Vo(t)

Here is my attempt at the laplace transform and subsequent frequency response:

Vi(s) = LC[s2Vo(s) - sVo(0-) - Vo'(0-)] + RC[sVo(s) - Vo(0-)] + Vo(s)

Vi(s) = LCs2Vo(s) + RCsVo(s) + Vo(s)

Vi(s) = (LCs2 + RCs + 1)Vo(s)

Vi(s)/Vo(s) = 1 + RCs + LCs2

Vo(s)/Vi(s) = 1/ (1 + RCs + LCs2) = H(s)

In which case given 1/sqrt(LC) = 4 and RC = 1/2 and LC = 1/16
at the frequency 1/sqrt(1/16) |H(s)| is:

H(s) = 1/ (1 + RCs + LCs2)

H(s) = 1/ (1 + 1/2(4) + 1/16(16)

H(s) = 1/ (1 + 2 + 1)

H(s) = 1/4 = 0.25


Does this solution look correct or have I gone wrong somewhere in the laplace transform. ie I have assumed Vo'(0) = 0 given that the question stipulates that the capacitor and inductor have 0 charge initially.
 

Attachments

  • circuitRLC2.jpg
    circuitRLC2.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 843
Physics news on Phys.org
H(s) you have found is correct, but please check your calculation of H(s) for wc=1/4.

Also since s=jwc, it is a complex number right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
11K
Back
Top