See Saw Balance: Heavy Person & Fulcrum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lula Belle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fulcrum
AI Thread Summary
In a seesaw scenario, when one person is significantly heavier, they must move closer to the fulcrum to achieve balance. This is explained by the principle of torque, where torque is the product of force and distance from the pivot. To balance the seesaw, the torque exerted by the heavier person must equal that of the lighter person. Simple experiments, like balancing a weighted object, can help illustrate this concept. Engaging with practical examples can make the underlying physics clearer and more intuitive.
Lula Belle
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
on a see saw when one person weighs much more than the other, does the heavier person need to move closer to the fulcrum to balance out the weight?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go to a park and try it.
 
I am so sorry to ask such a dumb question. I have a medical condition which prevents me from being able to figure things out as well as I used to. Please forgive me.
 
Thinking intuitively:
Think about two people with equal weights. In this situation, obviously to make them balance each other on a seesaw they would need to be the same distance away from the fulcrum.
Imagine then that one of those people (Let's say Person A) moves closer to the fulcrum (pivot). Which direction would the see saw move?

Thinking mathematically:
Torque = Force x r
r being the distance from the pivot point.

To make the seesaw balanced the torque by person A would have to be the same as the one for person B. If person A's weight is bigger, then what do you have to do to r to make it stay constant?
 
Lula Belle said:
I am so sorry to ask such a dumb question. I have a medical condition which prevents me from being able to figure things out as well as I used to. Please forgive me.

It is not a dumb question and I did not mean to be insensitive to your medical condition. Much of basic physics can be revealed by simple experiment and I meant to suggest that. I don't know your limitations, but you might be able to find a simple object, for example a metal kitchen ladle, where one end has much more mass than the other (or the mass is more concentrated). Then try balancing it on your finger (or on a pencil or the edge of something). Is the balance point closer to the "heavy" end or the light one?
Tom
 
Lula Belle said:
I am so sorry to ask such a dumb question. I have a medical condition which prevents me from being able to figure things out as well as I used to. Please forgive me.

And, here is an applet that allows you to "play" with this sort of question. Many people find that trying something out makes the equations more sensible.
http://www.walter-fendt.de/ph11e/lever.htm
Tom
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is（Figure 2）： F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculating distance to balance see-saw
Replies
26
Views
6K
Basics of forces/torques and fulcrum
Replies
6
Views
2K
Center of Mass Balancing Question
Replies
7
Views
2K
Man jumping onto a see-saw to launch bricks vertically
Replies
41
Views
6K
Are these torques correct for a simple balancing/fulcrum exp
Replies
4
Views
2K
Finding mass of unbalanced meter stick from torque
Replies
2
Views
2K
Balancing a Seesaw: Finding Mass with Torque
Replies
7
Views
10K
I Optimizing Drumstick Bounce: Finding the Magic Fulcrum Point
Replies
31
Views
2K
See Saw Balance: Heavier Person & Fulcrum
Replies
6
Views
4K
Balancing Act: Forces on See-Saws in a Square Arrangement
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top