I Separation angle between pulsars detecting Gravitational Waves

Click For Summary
The Hellings and Downs curve illustrates how the separation angle between pulsars influences the correlation of gravitational waves they detect. This angle is crucial for determining whether the waves interfere constructively or destructively, a concept that may seem counterintuitive without considering the geometry of gravitational waveforms. Distance from the observer does not significantly impact this correlation, as the angle remains the primary variable. Visualizing gravitational waveforms in 3D can aid in understanding these interactions better. The discussion emphasizes the importance of angular separation in gravitational wave detection.
zinn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How can separation angle alone tell you about the correlation between gravitational wave signals from pulsar timing?
I’m trying to understand the Hellings and Downs curve that is being used to argue for the existence of a gravitational wave background ([NANOGrav article][1]). How can it be that the angle between two pulsars is the only variable that determines if the gravitational waves will interfere constructively (correlated) or destructively (anti-correlated). I would have imagined that distance from the observer would also be a factor.

(Image source: https://astrobites.org/2016/08/10/the-predictor-of-pulsar-timing/)
3EFC2F01-19E9-4450-9E02-914871009C04.png


I imagine that a key part of understanding this concept would be visualising the gravitational waveforms in 3D. Should I be picturing something like this? [youtube video with gravitational wave animations][2]


[1]: https://nanograv.org/15yr/Summary/Background
[2]:
[3]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/w3DSd.png
 
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K