Shear Stress: Definition & Direction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and direction of shear stress, contrasting it with normal stress. Participants explore the conceptual understanding of shear stress, its scalar nature, and the implications of force direction on shear stress in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define shear stress as the force exerted parallel to a surface, contrasting it with normal stress, which acts perpendicular.
  • One participant asserts that shear stress does not have direction because it is a scalar, while others argue that it has direction as a component of the stress vector.
  • A participant describes shear stress as the component of the stress vector that is tangent to the surface, suggesting it has a directional aspect.
  • Another participant emphasizes that both normal and shear stresses acting on a surface have direction, based on their experience in fluid mechanics.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the definitions and the implications of scalar versus vector quantities in the context of shear stress.
  • There is a discussion about the representation of shear stress and normal stress in terms of traction vectors and unit normal vectors, with references to mathematical formulations.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the direction of the surface and how to specify it using unit normals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether shear stress has direction. Some maintain it is a scalar without direction, while others argue it has direction as part of the stress vector. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and implications of shear stress.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of definitions and terminology used in the discussion, particularly regarding the scalar nature of shear stress and its directional components. The mathematical steps and assumptions underlying the definitions are not fully resolved.

sumit saurav
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
what is shear stress?what is its direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Put you're finger on the table and push it parallel to its surface.The pressure you're exerting on the table is called a shear stress in contrast to normal stress.It doesn't have direction because its a scalar!
 
moving parallel woudnt it mean sliding over it?can u explain with a diagram?
 
Imagine pushing down on a table at an angle with your finger. The component of the force perpendicular to the table gives the normal stress, and the component parallel to the table gives the shear stress.
 
Suppose you have a surface, and an force acting obliquely on that surface. The stress vector is the force per unit area of the surface. The shear stress is the component of the stress vector in the direction tangent to the surface. This is also the same as the stress vector minus the normal component of the stress vector. Clearly, the shear stress has direction.
 
wait what should i take as direction of surface?
 
Chestermiller said:
Suppose you have a surface, and an force acting obliquely on that surface. The stress vector is the force per unit area of the surface. The shear stress is the component of the stress vector in the direction tangent to the surface. This is also the same as the stress vector minus the normal component of the stress vector. Clearly, the shear stress has direction.

The force vector has a direction. Shear stress is a scalar as Shyan indicated - the force per unit area - measured for example in psi. Just as with normal stress, there's no direction on shear stress.
 
TumblingDice said:
The force vector has a direction. Shear stress is a scalar as Shyan indicated - the force per unit area - measured for example in psi. Just as with normal stress, there's no direction on shear stress.
I don't know where you and Shyan learned mechanics, but based on a PhD in fluid mechanics and over 50 years of real world working experience in solid- and fluid mechanics, I can assure you that both normal stress and shear stress acting on a surface have direction. Of course, as with any vector, the magnitude of a vector is a scalar. Maybe that's what you are thinking of.
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
I don't know where you and Shyan learned mechanics, but based on a PhD in fluid mechanics and over 50 years of real world working experience in solid- and fluid mechanics, I can assure you that both normal stress and shear stress acting on a surface have direction. Of course, as with any vector, the magnitude of a vector is a scalar. Maybe that's what you are thinking of.

Chester, I use topics at PF to continue learning and try to help, too. I'm thankful for more experienced members like yourself who keep the information in check. The information I wrote was based on my understanding of the shear stress wiki that Shyan linked to in post #4. I've searched further and found this:
Normal and shear stresses are simply the components of the traction vector that are normal and parallel to the area's surface as shown in the figure. Using n for the unit normal vector to the surface, and s for the unit vector parallel to it, means that

σ=T⋅n and τ=T⋅s

It's very important to recognize that σ and τ here are each scalar values, not full tensors. This is the natural result of the dot product operations involving T, n, and s. (Dot products produce scalar results.)

I clipped the above from http://www.continuummechanics.org/cm/tractionvector.html

I'd like to understand better and correctly. Is this a misunderstanding of the information, or specifics of terminology, or something more?
 
  • #11
TumblingDice said:
Chester, I use topics at PF to continue learning and try to help, too. I'm thankful for more experienced members like yourself who keep the information in check. The information I wrote was based on my understanding of the shear stress wiki that Shyan linked to in post #4. I've searched further and found this:

I clipped the above from http://www.continuummechanics.org/cm/tractionvector.html

I'd like to understand better and correctly. Is this a misunderstanding of the information, or specifics of terminology, or something more?
I can see why you have been confused. The write-up in Wiki is very confusing, and this does a disservice to students like yourself who are seeking clarity. The quantities σ and τ that they refer to are the magnitudes of the normal stress and shear stress components of the traction vector. In terms of the unit normal vector \vec{n} and the unit vector in the tangential direction \vec{s} (whatever direction that happens to be) to the surface, the traction vector \vec{T} is represented as:
\vec{T}=σ\vec{n}+τ\vec{s}
The normal stress (vector) is the component of \vec{T} in the direction perpendicular to the surface σ\vec{n}, and the shear stress (vector) is the component of \vec{T} in the direction of the \vec{s} unit vector τ\vec{s}. The magnitude of the normal stress component is obtained by dotting the traction vector with the unit normal:
σ=\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{n}=(σ\vec{n}+τ\vec{s})\centerdot\vec{n}
The magnitude of the shear stress component is obtained by dotting the traction vector with the tangential unit vector:
τ=\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{s}=(σ\vec{n}+τ\vec{s})\centerdot\vec{s}
Initially, you may know the traction vector \vec{T} and the unit normal vector \vec{n}, but you will probably not know the direction of the shear stress vector \vec{s}. You can determine the direction of the shear stress vector \vec{s} as follows:
\vec{T}=σ\vec{n}+τ\vec{s}=(\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{n})\vec{n}+τ\vec{s}
From this, if follows that:
τ\vec{s}=\vec{T}-(\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{n})\vec{n}
If we take the dot product of this equation with itself, we obtain:
τ^2=\vec{T}-(\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{n})\vec{n}=T^2-(\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{n})^2
where T is the magnitude of the traction vector. Therefore, the magnitude of the shear stress component is given by:
τ=\sqrt{T^2-(\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{n})^2}
The unit vector in the shear stress direction is then given by:
\vec{s}=\frac{(\vec{T}-(\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{n})\vec{n})}{\sqrt{T^2-(\vec{T}\centerdot \vec{n})^2}}
So, from knowledge of the traction vector and the unit normal vector, one can determine both the magnitude and direction of the shear stress vector.

I hope this helps and provides greater clarity.

Chet
 
  • #12
sumit saurav said:
wait what should i take as direction of surface?
You specify the orientation a surface by specifying the components of a unit normal to the surface.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K