SHM Pendulum length/gravity question

  • Thread starter Thread starter jojo45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Shm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the formula for the period of a pendulum, T = 2π√(2L/3g), specifically the reasoning behind the 2L/3g term. Participants confirm that a straight line graph of T² versus L is appropriate for the experiment, with the gradient related to gravity. Clarification is sought on whether to use the quantity or unit in calculations, and the importance of measuring from the pivot to the center of mass of the rod is emphasized. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by the experimenter due to time constraints and limited access to instructor support. Overall, the thread provides guidance on conducting the pendulum experiment effectively.
jojo45
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
T= 2pie Square root of 2L/3g

I got a couple of questions.

1) why is it 2L/3g?
2) would my straight line graph be T^2 vs L? ( so gradient is T^2/l?)
3) after i get my gradient do i compare it to the gravity 9.81?
4) is the equation going to be time^2=XXL or s^2=xxm ? do i use the unit or the quantity?

thanks so much for your help. I'm doing the experiment tomorrow and need to know ASAP. cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.
jojo45 said:
T= 2pie Square root of 2L/3g

I got a couple of questions.

1) why is it 2L/3g?
2) would my straight line graph be T^2 vs L? ( so gradient is T^2/l?)
3) after i get my gradient do i compare it to the gravity 9.81?
4) is the equation going to be time^2=XXL or s^2=xxm ? do i use the unit or the quantity?

thanks so much for your help. I'm doing the experiment tomorrow and need to know ASAP. cheers

(1a) I'm assuming that your using a "rod pendulum", in which case: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/penrod.html#c1

(1b) And for a general physical pendulum: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pendp.html#c1

(2) That depends on what you're measuring (dependent variable) and what you're varying (independent variable). If this is a standard "measuring g with a pendulum" experiment, I would think you would be plotting T2 vs. L, yes. Although, I'm not sure how you're going to vary the length of the rod easily.

(3) The general equation of a line [through the origin] is y=mx, where m is the gradient. So, if you're plotting T2 vs. L your gradient would be 8\pi^2/3g.

I would have thought all of this would have been explained by your instructor.
 
Last edited:
Hootenanny said:
Welcome to Physics Forums.(1a) I'm assuming that your using a "rod pendulum", in which case: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/penrod.html#c1

(1b) And for a general physical pendulum: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pendp.html#c1

(2) That depends on what you're measuring (dependent variable) and what you're varying (independent variable). If this is a standard "measuring g with a pendulum" experiment, I would think you would be plotting T2 vs. L, yes. Although, I'm not sure how you're going to vary the length of the rod easily.

(3) The general equation of a line [through the origin] is y=mx, where m is the gradient. So, if you're plotting T2 vs. L your gradient would be 4\pi/3g.

I would have thought all of this would have been explained by your instructor.

dam this is a hard experiment. Yes i am doing a rod experiment.

2) I'm guessing we going to get different length of rods provided. So i assume it's T^2 vs L.
ALso. For working out the gradient. I think it's L/ T^2 =X and then re arrange the fomula. G ( gravity)= (4(pi^2)2X) / 3 is it correct?

3) oh I am just wondering for the equation do i use the quantity or the unit?

also i was reading the page u add. for measuring the length. It's from the pivot to the center of the rod?? why is that? why not the whole length?

Well this is actually a internal for my school tomorrow. But the teacher allows us to see the test paper before hand. Since my school is having a mock exams this week i only go to school for exams. Didn't have time to go school and ask. I doubt my teacher would help me. He's probably going to tell me go home and think about it myself.

very appreciated for your time sir. I'm so grateful someone can help me out at this time. thank you. :)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top