Should a Freshman Take a Sophomore-Level Math Methods in Physics Course?

AI Thread Summary
Taking a sophomore-level math methods in physics course as a freshman is a debated topic, especially for students with a strong math background. The course covers complex analysis, differential operators, and other advanced topics, typically recommended after completing multivariable calculus and introductory physics. While the professor expressed concern about the lack of freshman participants, many believe that a solid foundation in math makes the course manageable. Some advise that the experience could be beneficial, as future physics courses will likely be equally challenging. Ultimately, if the student feels confident in their abilities, enrolling in the course could enhance their understanding and appreciation of both math and physics.
occh
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
I am a second-semester undergraduate in Physics and I have been looking to do some extra course work in my major beyond the intro course sequence. I took what was basically the equivalent of AP physics in high school, but the program at my university STRONGLY recommends that all physics majors retake the advanced levels of the intro physics sequence. I have decided to heed this recommendation but I want to do more if I can. There is a course at my university, considered a sophomore level, that is focused on mathematics methods in physics and it introduces: complex analysis, differential operators, integral transforms, ODE's and PDE's and special functions. The plan of study generally recommends taking this class after multivariable and the intro course sequence in the fourth semester. I emailed the professor and he gave me permission to take the course, however he warned that no freshman has ever taken the class before and encouraged me to look through the course materials on the previous years course website if i decided to enroll. Looking through these materials, it appears challenging, but not completely over my head. My math background includes through multivariable calculus and will be taking DiffEQ next semester as well. Does taking this course sound like a bad idea? Any advice would be most appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is difficult to give you particular advice as it all depends on your situation. The worst thing that could happen would be that you get in over your head and fail both subjects. If you feel confident that you will not fail (or get the grade you really want in) the physics course, I do not see any harm in trying to do the extra credit.
 
My situation was identical to yours freshman year (except I didn't retake intro courses). Math methods was a fun class and I would strongly encourage you to take it next semester. It's not like further Physics courses are going to be easier than an intro math methods course so you might as well get used to it. Furthermore, don't let the professor discourage you from taking the class as a Freshman since that is not at all uncommon for people coming from an AP Physics background.
 
  • Like
Likes occh
Thanks very much for both of your replies, i think i am going to take the course. I feel like I'm one of the few freshman physics majors at my university that is in love with the math AND the physics, not just the concepts of physics.
 
Since you have studied calculus, I see no reason to think that you would find it too difficult. My only concern is that courses like this are sometimes taught by physicists who only know how to do the calculations, and don't understand the proofs. But I guess the point of the course is to give you an overview, so that you can decide for yourself later if you want (or need) to take real math courses about these topics.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top