Show that a complex PE yields a time dependant probability of finding a particle

jb646
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Starting from Schrodinger's Equation show that a complex potential energy V=α+iβ yields a time dependent probability P of finding the particle in (-inf,inf), i.e. the particle is unstable and normalization cannot be insured over time. Compute P(+)


Homework Equations


SE: ih/2m=-h^2/2m(∫∂ψ/∂x )+Vψ

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried inserting my value of potential energy into the SE as follows
ih/2m=-h^2/2m(∫∂ψ/∂x )+(α+iβ)ψ
and then i got stuck, am i supposed to integrate next or stick an an A and try to normalize and then prove that because it is not normalizeable it is unstable. Also what is P(+)

Thanks for any advice you can offer me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what they mean by P(+). Look it up in the book / ask your instructor/adviser.

Well, ensuring the conservation of probability (density) over time relies heavily on the fact that this follows from a unitary evolution of states. What you can do is to show that the Hamiltonian will no longer be self-adjoint, since that wouldn't allow us to use Stone's theorem to obtain a unitary evolution.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top