MHB Show that a Parametric Equation Maps To Another Line By Linear Transformation.

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a linear transformation maps a parametric equation of a line, given by $\textbf{x} = \textbf{p} + t\textbf{v}$, to another line or a single point. The solution correctly applies the linear transformation property, resulting in $T(\textbf{x}) = T\textbf{p} + t(T\textbf{v})$, which leads to the new parametric equation $\textbf{y} = \textbf{q} + t\textbf{w}$. It is noted that if $T\textbf{v} = \textbf{0}$, then the transformation results in a single point $\textbf{y} = \textbf{q}$. The conclusion confirms that the mapping $\textbf{x} \mapsto \textbf{y}$ by the transformation $T$ is valid. The final solution was confirmed to be correct after addressing the degenerate case.
bwpbruce
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
$\textbf{Problem}$
Given $\textbf{v} \ne \textbf{0}$ and $\textbf{p}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, the line through $\textbf{p}$ in the direction of $\textbf{v}$ is given by $\textbf{x} = \textbf{p} + t\textbf{v}$. Show that linear transformation $T: \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$ maps this line onto another line or onto a single point.

$\textbf{My Solution}$:
$\textbf{x} = \textbf{p} + t\textbf{v}$

By Linear Transformation Property:
$T(\textbf{x}) =T(\textbf{p} + t\textbf{v})$
$T(\textbf{x}) =T\textbf{p} + t(T\textbf{v})$

Let $T(\textbf{x}) = \textbf{y}, T\textbf{p} = \textbf{q}, T\textbf{v} = \textbf{w}$
Then $\textbf{y} = \textbf{q} + t\textbf{w}$ is another parametric equation and $\textbf{y}$ is the other line that $\textbf{x}$ maps to except in the case where $\textbf{w} = \textbf{0}$. Then $\textbf{y} = \textbf{q}$

Result:
$\textbf{y} = \textbf{q} + t\textbf{w}$

or

$\textbf{y} = \textbf{q}$

Conclusion:
$\textbf{x} \mapsto \textbf{y}$ by $T$.

Check my solution please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

It's almost correct, but $y$ doesn't need to be a line, read again the statement and fill the degenrate case.
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi,

It's almost correct, but $y$ doesn't need to be a line, read again the statement and fill the degenrate case.

Is that better?
 
Yes, now is completely correct :D
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K