Show that the eigenvalues of the overlap matrix are positive

jarra
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The task is to show that the eigenvalues of overlap matrix \tilde S are positive.


Homework Equations


The overlap matrix is defined as (\tilde S)_{nm} = \langle \xi_n \vert \xi_m \rangle, with \xi_k being the base vectors of the wavefunction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overlap_matrix


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to show that the eigenvalues are positive by showing that \tilde S is positive definite. Both with the condition \vec x^{\ast} \tilde S \vec x > 0 and the condition that all the 'sub-determinants' are larger than zero. But I don't get it right, please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jarra said:

Homework Statement


The task is to show that the eigenvalues of overlap matrix \tilde S are positive.


Homework Equations


The overlap matrix is defined as (\tilde S)_{nm} = \langle \xi_n \vert \xi_m \rangle, with \xi_k being the base vectors of the wavefunction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overlap_matrix


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to show that the eigenvalues are positive by showing that \tilde S is positive definite. Both with the condition \vec x^{\ast} \tilde S \vec x > 0 and the condition that all the 'sub-determinants' are larger than zero. But I don't get it right, please help.

In a naively way i would say: It is just an integral of a probabilty distribution---> it is positive by definition!

More thecnically: the diagonal members are for sure positive and what about the off diagonal?

Hint: use the fact that S_{jk}=\overline{S}_{kj}
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top