Show that the function satisfies the Schrodinger eqaution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (S.W.E) in one dimension, with a focus on applying Leibniz's integral rule and understanding potential functions. The user expresses confusion about differentiating the wave function and integrating the potential function related to gravity. Key points include the clarification that the potential should align with the force, and the correct form for the potential in a uniform field is linear, not inverse square. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of understanding Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics, as they are crucial for solving the equations presented. Overall, the user is seeking guidance on how to properly apply these concepts to confirm their solutions.
pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I am quite new to quantum mechanics and i am self teaching through a book called "Quantum mechanics for applied physics and engineering" by Albert Thomas Fromhold Jr. There are no solutions to the exercises, I am im not sure how to begin with these types of questions since they are new to me.

Quantum mechanics Qns.PNG

Homework Equations



1) Time dependent one-dimensional S.W.E
2) Time dependant one-dimensional S.W.E with potential function

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to start for the first, i could try differentiating it, but I am not sure how, maybe the fundamental theorem of calculus ?

As for the second, I know i need to include a potential function for gravity which I am guessing would be of the form GMm/r^2 in the unit x direction...

Thanks for any pointers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first, you should use the Leibniz integral rule.
And for the second, there are 2 problems with what you suggest:
1) The inverse square law is for the force, not for the potential.
2) The potential should be an accordance with the force. The potential 1/r is for the inverse square force. The uniform field of the question has a linear potential. In fact the potential is derived from V=-\int_{r_{ref}}^r \vec g \cdot \vec{dr}.
 
Hi Shyan, thank you for the reply.

I have tried to apply Leibniz's Integral rule as you suggested and have run into what seems a dead end;

## \psi_{xx}(x,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}-k^2A(k)e^{i(kx-wt)}dk##

## \psi_{t}(x,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}-i\omega A(k)e^{i(kx-wt)}dk##

When I sub both of these into the one dimensional time dependent Schrodinger equation,##\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\psi_{xx}=i\hbar\psi_{t}##, I get;

## \frac{\hbar}{2m}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}-k^2A(k)e^{i(kx-wt)}dk=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\omega A(k)e^{i(kx-wt)}dk##

I do not know where to proceed from here, I can't figure out how to make the integrals on either side of the equality look like each other (so i can cancel them) since i can't take k or ##\omega## out of the integral. I tried to use that k=w/v where v is velocity but to no avail. Another pointer would be greatly appreciated!

For part two, would the potential function be; ##V(x)=\frac{-GMm}{x}## ? Also can i assume that it is a one dimensional case, I suspect i can't since the hint involved the unit vector in the x direction, which seems to imply 3 dimensional space?
 
Your wave-function is the superposition of plane waves of all possible wave-numvers(Lets call them modes). Now for each mode(\varphi_k(x)), we know that its energy is only kinetic and so we have \hat H \varphi_k(x)=\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}\varphi_k(x). We also know that i\hbar \partial_t \varphi_k(x)=\hbar \omega \varphi_k(x). So from Schrodinger equation, we have \hbar \omega=\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}.
I told you about part two, but looks like you didn't pay attention. V(x)=-\int_{x_0}^x g \hat x \cdot \vec {dx'}=-\int_{x_0}^x g \hat x \cdot \hat x dx'=-\int_{x_0}^x g dx'=-g(x-x_0), where x_0 is the origin of the potential which is arbitrary.
 
I am not familiar with the notation ##\hat H##, does it represent the total energy of the system? I have not learned about Hamiltonians yet, would you reccomend that i do so before I learn QM? I think the book I am reading will introduce it soon though...
I did manage to get it to ##\omega=\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}## but i couldn't see how this confirmed it is a valid solution. I'm obviously missing something quite important.
 
You should know what is a Hamiltonian so study about it. Anyway, \hat H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + V(x)(for one particle in 1D). But because in the first exercise, V(x)=0, we have \hat H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}.
Just take the integrals to the same side and factor A(k) e^{i(kx-\omega t)} dk.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top