Show the functions are eigenfunctions of the hamiltonian

rmjmu507
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Given the hamiltonian in this form: H=\hbar\omega(b^{+}b+.5)

b\Psi_{n}=\sqrt{n}\Psi_{n-1}
b^{+}\Psi_{n}=\sqrt{n+1}\Psi_{n+1}

Attempt:

H\Psi_{n}=\hbar\omega(b^{+}b+.5)\Psi_{n}

I get to

H\Psi_{n}=\hbar\omega\sqrt{n}(b^{+}\Psi_{n-1}+.5\Psi_{n-1})


But now I'm stuck. Where can I go from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not correct, you have to split the Hamiltonian as it should be split:

H = \hbar\omega b^{\dagger}b + \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega \hat{1}

then act on an arbitrary vector.
 
I still end up with a similar problem though...I will have the raising operator acting on \Psi_{n-1}


H= ℏω\sqrt{n}(b^{+}\Psi_{n-1})+\frac{1}{2}ℏω\Psi_{n}
 
Excelent. You need to do a trick on the relation given, namely realize that the <n> can be replaced by other values. Which substitution is useful ?

P.S. Always post your HW questions here, in this forum.
 
Can I say that if b^{+}\Psi_{n}=\sqrt{n+1}\Psi_{n+1} then b^{+}\Psi_{n-1}=\sqrt{n}\Psi_{n}

which would allow me to write the Hamiltonian as

H=ℏω(n+\frac{1}{2})\Psi_{n}

and because ℏω(n+\frac{1}{2}) is just a number, then

b\Psi_{n}=\sqrt{n}\Psi_{n-1} and
b^{+}\Psi_{n}=\sqrt{n+1}\Psi_{n+1}

are eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top