Showing that general operator equations are hermitian

UCLphysics
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a)For a general operator A, show that and i(A-A+) are hermitian?

b) If operators A and B are hermitian, show that the operator (A+B)^n is Hermitian.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The first part I did,

(A+A+)+=(A++A)=(A+A+)

i(A-A+)=[i(A-A+)]+=(iA)+-(iA+)+)=i(A-A+)

The second part I used binomial expansion (induction) but I was told they do not commute so this cannot be done?

Is my answer to the first part correct and what route should I take for the second? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First part looks about right.

For the second part, do you really need to multiply things out? After all, if A and B are Hermitian then A+B is also Hermitian...
 
The problems seems to have no connection with <Advanced Physics> and neither with mathematics, since it's not mathematically (i.e. in agreement with mathematics) formulated and not even semantically.
 
For example, the mathematical problem for point a) should have been

"Let A be a densly defined linear operator on a complex separable Hilbert space \mathcal{H}.

Prove that if D(A)\cap D\left(A^{\dagger}\right) is dense everywhere in \mathcal{H},

then the operator i\left(A-A^{\dagger}\right) is symmetric.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top