Simple Beam Problem: Solving for Vertical Forces and Symmetry in Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demian^^
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a beam problem involving vertical forces and symmetry, where a beam is supported by four points under a constant downward force. The user successfully reduces the number of unknowns to two using symmetry but struggles to solve the equations of static equilibrium, as they yield the same relationship between the remaining unknowns. It is noted that the system is hyperstatic, meaning it cannot be solved solely with static equations; additional relations, such as forces-displacement and compatibility equations, are necessary. The conversation highlights the complexity of real-world scenarios where support forces can vary, complicating the analysis. Ultimately, the problem is deemed too simplified, indicating that more factors must be considered for a complete solution.
Demian^^
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to refresh my mechanics by solving some fairly simple, self invented, beam problems. This goes fine, but I can't figure out how to solve the following one.. it sounds simple enough, though..
Imagine a (two dimensional) beam of size d with a vertical outside distributed constant downward force acting on it (for instance gravity).
It is supported by four points that can exert a vertical force on the beam, to keep it in balance. They are placed completely symmetrical: two of them at the outsides of the beam and two at a distance, for instance, d/10 away from the center of the beam. Their forces can be named Va,Vb,Vc,Vd or something. When i use the symmetric properties I can reduce the number of unknowns to two, but then I'm stuck. I can use Sum_verticals=0 and Sum_Moments=0, but they both give the same relation between the two unknowns that are left over.
Is there a fundamental reason why this cannot be solved this way? Does the outcome mean that there is in fact one degree of freedom left? This does not sound very physical, as I can imagine that the forces exerted by the points on the beam will always be the same in a true situation.
Could anyone help me on this one? I'm probably making some very stupid mistakes.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it: Imagine four people carrying a huge log, distributed as you have stated. Now, without changing any of the positions of the vertical supports, one of the guys in the middle could ease up on his lifting (thus increasing the load on the others) or he could lift harder (decreasing the load on the others). Can you see why there isn't enough information to solve this?
 
Yes, I'd figured that out, more or less. I wonder, however, if I could add extra equations to solve the problem. If my intuition is right and all the supporting points are equal, then it sounds logical that everytime you would repeat the experiment, they would exert the same reaction force and not suddenly the two middlepoints each 5N more and the outer ones 5N less. So I assume the problem as stated here is too 'simplified' and there are other factors that play a role?
(Thanks for the reply!)
 
Well the system you described is an Hyperstatic system of degree one. It can't be solved only by the equations of static. You need also forces-displacement relations (constitutive equations and compatibility equations).

Check https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=80873" for more information.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top