Simple Divergence related problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


Sketch the vector function
$$\vec{v}=\frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}$$
and compute its divergence. The answer may surprise you...can you explain it?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have recently started with Introduction to Electrodynamics by David J Griffiths and according to the book notation,
$$\hat{r}=\frac{\vec{r}}{r}=\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}}$$

I have calculated the divergence to be zero. The problem is how do I draw the vector function? I mean the book shows a few drawings of vector functions but they all are in 2-D. I have three variables, x,y and z. How do I sketch the function in this case?

And what is special about the result?

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the divergence is zero, wherever it is DEFINED in a normal manner.
That is everywhere, execept at r=0.

To interpret it for regions about r=0, it means that for every annulus about r=0, the divergence is 0.
------------------------
The really interesting feature is, of course, when you make a surface integral around a volume (containing no holes) containing r=0.

Your result will be 4\pi

This motivates to represent the divergence as div(\vec{v})=4\pi\delta(\vec{r}), where we use the Dirac Delta function.

By using this, we have in a clever manner formally achieved to regard this special case as ALSO being in accordance with Gauss' theorem:
\int_{V}(div(\vec{v})dV=\int_{S}\vec{v}\cdot{d\vec{S}}

(Note that Gauss' theorem is typically derived for functions DEFINED on the whole volume (otherwise, how can you integrate it over the volume?), so there is no a priori contradiction between Gauss' theorem in that the divergence is zero, yet a surface integral around r=0 equals 4*pi. For example, for every region on which the vector is defined, say an annulus about r=0, Gauss' theorem is trivially valid, since the surface integral for such regions reduces to 4\pi-4\pi=0)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
arildno said:
The really interesting feature is, of course, when you make a surface integral around a volume (containing no holes) containing r=0.

Your result will be 4\pi

This motivates to represent the divergence as div(\vec{v})=4\pi\delta(\vec{r}), where we use the Dirac Delta function.

By using this, we have in a clever manner formally achieved to regard this special case as ALSO being in accordance with Gauss' theorem:
\int_{V}(div(\vec{v})dV=\int_{S}\vec{v}\cdot{d\vec{S}}

(Note that Gauss' theorem is typically derived for functions DEFINED on the whole volume (otherwise, how can you integrate it over the volume?), so there is no a priori contradiction between Gauss' theorem in that the divergence is zero, yet a surface integral around r=0 equals 4*pi. For example, for every region on which the vector is defined, say an annulus about r=0, Gauss' theorem is trivially valid, since the surface integral for such regions reduces to 4\pi-4\pi=0)

Thanks arildno for the effort you have put here. I will return to this thread when the book introduces the surface integrals and the dirac delta function. The problem I posted is an intext question just after the divergence section in the book and much of what you wrote is introduced later in the chapter.

Thanks! :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top