Simple Harmonic Easy Qualitve problem, something I'm not getting

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying which force equations can lead to simple harmonic motion (SHM). The key equations considered include F(x) = -9x, F(x) = 9x, and F(x) = -9x + 7, with participants debating their validity based on the definition of SHM, F = -kx. There is confusion regarding the inclusion of additional terms and whether all equations could potentially represent SHM under certain conditions. Clarifications emphasize that the traditional form of Hooke's Law is F = -kx, and the importance of the negative sign in indicating restoring force. The conversation highlights the nuances in interpreting force equations related to SHM.
Jediknight
Messages
41
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Which of these forces could result in simple harmonic motion

F(x)=−9(x−7)3

F(x)=−9x+7

F(x)=−9x3

F(x)=−9x

F(x)=9x
F(x)=9x3

9x3 is 9x^3, same with itsopposite

Homework Equations



F=kx, the definition of shm

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured -9x and 9x were the only ones, i tried that

i tried those two and 9x+7 might work, just a measurement from a different spot

then I tried taking off -9x (leaving 9x and 9x+7) out of despirationI'm thinking maybe its a trick question and the answer might be all of them (like how pendulum at very small distances can be looked at as smh, or is there some fundamental concept I'm not getting here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jediknight said:

Homework Statement



Which of these forces could result in simple harmonic motion

F(x)=−9(x−7)3

F(x)=−9x+7

F(x)=−9x3

F(x)=−9x

F(x)=9x
F(x)=9x3

9x3 is 9x^3, same with itsopposite

Homework Equations



F=kx, the definition of shm

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured -9x and 9x were the only ones, i tried that

i tried those two and 9x+7 might work, just a measurement from a different spot

then I tried taking off -9x (leaving 9x and 9x+7) out of despirationI'm thinking maybe its a trick question and the answer might be all of them (like how pendulum at very small distances can be looked at as smh, or is there some fundamental concept I'm not getting here?

Check the sign on your equation above that I've bolded in red. That's not the traditional definition used with Hooke's Law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooke's_law

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Jediknight
good call, if F equaled kx a spring would push a load further and faster til it hit the speed of light!

(incase it wasnt obvious to everyone reading, F=-kx, F=-kx+c is fine to
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top