Simple kinematic equations question?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a pole-vaulter falling from a height and landing on a foam-rubber pad. The key confusion arises from misinterpreting the 0.34 seconds, which is the time taken for the pole-vaulter to come to rest after landing, not the time of the fall. To solve for the velocity just before impact, the correct approach involves using kinematic equations to first determine the time of the fall. Once this time is established, the velocity can be calculated, followed by determining the force exerted during the collision. Clarification on the problem led to successfully solving both parts using the appropriate kinematic equations.
sbacker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 52.2 kg pole-vaulter falls from rest from a height of 3.6 m onto a foam-rubber pad. The pole-vaulter comes to rest 0.34 s after landing on the pad.

(a) Calculate the athlete's velocity just before reaching the pad.

(b) Calculate the constant force exerted on the pole-vaulter due to the collision.

Homework Equations



Kinematic equations: V = Vo + AT, X = ((V+Vo)/2)*T, V^2 = Vo^2 + 2AX, X = VoT +.5AT^2

F = ma (though I haven't attempted part b yet)

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems like this problem should be easily and quickly solvable using any of the kinematic equations (4 of three values are known, right? Time, distance, acceleration, and original velocity), but this is what I tried and both answers were wrong:

0 = Vo + 9.8 m/s^2 * .34 s (tried 3.33, didn't work)

3.6 = Vo(.34) + .5 * 9.8 *.34^2
3.6 = Vo * .19259 (tried 18.7, didn't work)

I'm a little confused about whether the pole vaulter's mass is irrelevant information, or how to use it—I think I'm a little off with the kinematic equations. Thanks for your help and answers, I know I'm not very good at physics! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sbacker,

sbacker said:

Homework Statement



A 52.2 kg pole-vaulter falls from rest from a height of 3.6 m onto a foam-rubber pad. The pole-vaulter comes to rest 0.34 s after landing on the pad.

(a) Calculate the athlete's velocity just before reaching the pad.

(b) Calculate the constant force exerted on the pole-vaulter due to the collision.

Homework Equations



Kinematic equations: V = Vo + AT, X = ((V+Vo)/2)*T, V^2 = Vo^2 + 2AX, X = VoT +.5AT^2

F = ma (though I haven't attempted part b yet)

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems like this problem should be easily and quickly solvable using any of the kinematic equations (4 of three values are known, right? Time, distance, acceleration, and original velocity)

No, for part a you do not know the time. There are two parts to the motion: the fall from the highest point to the pad, and then the motion as the person pushes down into the pad (stopping).

The 0.34seconds refers to how long it takes for the pad to stop the person, not how long it takes for the person to reach the pad.
 
Looks like you've just misread the question. 0.34 seconds isn't how long it takes the pole vaulter to fall onto the pad, it's how long it takes the pad to "pop back" after the vaulter lands. So your first step should be to figure out how long it takes him to reach the pad. The 0.34 seconds don't matter until part b of the question.

Edit: Oops. Thought I'd refreshed the thread before replying.
 
Oh, I read the problem way too fast! How silly of me— thanks for clarifying, I got both parts of the problem right using the kinematic equations with only original velocity, acceleration, and distance. Thanks for pointing out my mistake!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top