Simple particle on slope confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding calculating the velocity of a particle on a frictionless slope using two different methods. The initial approach involved using the constant acceleration formula, yielding a velocity of v = sqrt(2gl*sin(theta)). The second method, which involved integrating acceleration over time, initially seemed to produce a different result, leading to uncertainty. Upon further examination, it was revealed that both methods yield the same result when properly evaluated. The confusion arose from a miscalculation during the verification process, which was clarified through peer assistance.
rmawatson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a particle on a slope with angle theta with no friction. v(0) = 0, x(0) = 0, with coordinates i down the slope and j normal to it.

I am confused about why with the constant velocity forumla I get a different answer to my attempted method.. I can't see what's wrong..I need to find the velocity at "l"
x is the top of the slope of a particle on a smooth surface, with no friction,
v(0) = 0, x(0) = 0

along i direction I am starting with:

mgsin(theta) == ma

gsin(theta) == a

using constant acceleration formula

v^2 = v0^2 + 2a0(x-x0)
v^2 = 0 + 2gsin(theta)(x-0)
v = sqrt( 2gl*sin(theta) )

My original attempt below is wrong, but I can't see why. I want to know what it doesn't work the same.

so from
gsin(theta) == a

Integrating wrt t

gsin(theta)t == v + c

Integrating wrt t again

1/2*gsin(theta)t^2 == x + ct + d

with v(0) == 0 and x(0) == 0

0 = c and d = 0

so if I now plugged in 'l' to the equation for position

1/2*gsin(theta)t^2 == l

and solve for t I get,

t = sqrt[ (2l)/(gsin(theta)) ]

so this is the time at which position == l ?

If I then plug this time into the equation for velocity,

gsin(theta)t == v

gsin(theta)*sqrt[ (2l)/(gsin(theta)) ] = v

not the same as with the constant velocity forumla..
why ? what is wrong with this method

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rmawatson said:

Homework Statement


a particle on a slope with angle theta with no friction. v(0) = 0, x(0) = 0, with coordinates i down the slope and j normal to it.

I am confused about why with the constant velocity forumla I get a different answer to my attempted method.. I can't see what's wrong..I need to find the velocity at "l"
x is the top of the slope of a particle on a smooth surface, with no friction,
v(0) = 0, x(0) = 0

along i direction I am starting with:

mgsin(theta) == ma

gsin(theta) == a

using constant acceleration formula

v^2 = v0^2 + 2a0(x-x0)
v^2 = 0 + 2gsin(theta)(x-0)
v = sqrt( 2gl*sin(theta) )

My original attempt below is wrong, but I can't see why. I want to know what it doesn't work the same.

so from
gsin(theta) == a

Integrating wrt t

gsin(theta)t == v + c

Integrating wrt t again

1/2*gsin(theta)t^2 == x + ct + d

with v(0) == 0 and x(0) == 0

0 = c and d = 0

so if I now plugged in 'l' to the equation for position

1/2*gsin(theta)t^2 == l

and solve for t I get,

t = sqrt[ (2l)/(gsin(theta)) ]

so this is the time at which position == l ?

If I then plug this time into the equation for velocity,

gsin(theta)t == v

gsin(theta)*sqrt[ (2l)/(gsin(theta)) ] = v

not the same as with the constant velocity forumla..
why ? what is wrong with this method

Hello rmawatson. Welcome to PF!

Those answers are the same !
 
If I plug in numbers I get a different answer for both??
 
rmawatson said:
If I plug in numbers I get a different answer for both??
Example ... ?
 
Looks like I did something wrong when I checked it. I was so sure that my formula must be wrong (as it was a different way to the book and done by me) I didn't check twice.

You are right, and with some simple rearranging it comes out the same... thank you for your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top