Simple physics kinematic one dimension problem?

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the original speed of a vehicle given that increasing its speed by 5.0 mi/h reduces the time to travel one mile by 13 seconds. To solve, the relationship between distance, speed, and time (X = VT) is applied, with necessary unit conversions for time. The original speed (vi) and the new speed (vi + 5.0 mi/h) are used to set up equations based on the time difference caused by the speed increase. Consistency in units is emphasized, particularly converting 13 seconds to hours for accurate calculations. The solution requires careful manipulation of these equations to find the original speed in miles per hour.
papi
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Driving along a crowded freeway, you notice that it takes a time t to go from one mile marker to the next. When you increase your speed by 5.0 mi/h, the time to go one mile decreases by 13 s. What was your original speed in mi/hr?

Homework Equations



X (which in this case is 1 bc 1 mile)=VT

The Attempt at a Solution


Ive tried countless times on paper
I know you convert the 13s into hr by dividing 13/3600
i know you do something with t-13
but I am so lost.
please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For consistency with metrics, it would be best to convert your units to metric format. Assuming there is no acceleration, the original velocity would be vi. Your displacement, delta(x), would then be equal to vi*t, t being time. When your velocity is increased, it takes 13s less to cover to cover one mile. Your velocity is increased by 5.0 mi/h, your time is 13s less, but your displacement is the same. With this, you should be able to conceptualize what to do (remember to convert your units).
 
papi said:
X (which in this case is 1 bc 1 mile)=VT

That's a good start. And you can rewrite that equation with the following changes:

If the velocity was V at first, what is the velocity after it increases by 5.0 mi/hr?

And if the time was T at first, what is the time after it decreases?

And yes, you'll need to be consistent with the time units, so the 13s becomes (13/3600) hr.

I recommend keeping all the length units as miles, since the given information uses miles and it says to give the answer in miles/hr.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top