Simple question on minimising the trial wavefunction

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59

Homework Statement


After a calculation of the lowest energy using two variational parameters a and b it is found that: E_{T}(a,b) = 2a^{2} + 16b^{2}+a
What is the optimal (minimum) value of E_{T}

Homework Equations


It's just derivation.

The Attempt at a Solution


\frac{\delta E_{T}}{\delta a} = 4a + 1 = 0

therefore a= -1/4

\frac{\delta E_{T}}{\delta b} = 32b = 0

therefore b=0

when the values are put into ET I get zero?

E_{T}(a',b') = 2 (-\frac{1}{4})^{2} - \frac{1}{4} = 0

why would it be zero?

also were were told to take the second derivative to find the inflection? why would we do this? what does it tell us?

Thanks in advance for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not zero. You did a computational error:

2(1/4)^2 -1/4 = 2/16 - 1/4 = 1/8 -2/8 = -1/8
 
Orodruin said:
It is not zero. You did a computational error:

2(1/4)^2 -1/4 = 2/16 - 1/4 = 1/8 -2/8 = -1/8

hm that would explain it, many thanks for pointing this out, appreciated!

Any idea as to why the second derivative is taken and what it would tell us about the system?

Thanks for the reply!
 
i'm probably being really stupid here but what would I do with something like:

ET (a,b,c) = (a+b)2 - ab + c4

which gives:

dE/da = 2a + b = 0
dE/db = 2b + a = 0

i can see it has solutions but what values should I use?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top