Transforming Positive Definite Quadratic Forms: A Simplification Approach

Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,703
Reaction score
1,588
I'm having a bit of a brain fart here. Given a positive definite quadratic form
\sum \alpha_{i,j} x_i x_j
is it possible to re-write this as
\sum k_i x_i^2 + \left( \sum \beta_i x_i \right)^2
with all the ki positive? I feel like the answer should be obvious
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Office_Shredder said:
I'm having a bit of a brain fart here. Given a positive definite quadratic form
\sum \alpha_{i,j} x_i x_j
is it possible to re-write this as
\sum k_i x_i^2 + \left( \sum \beta_i x_i \right)^2
with all the ki positive? I feel like the answer should be obvious

Yes. Every quadratic form

\sum \alpha_{i,j} x_i x_j

determines a matrix (\alpha_{i,j})_{i,j}. The only thing you need to do is diagonalize this matrix.
 
Note that the matrix corresponding to any quadratic form is symmetric (we take a_{ij}= a_{ji} equal to 1/2 the coefficient of x_ix_j. Therefore, the matrix corresponding to a quadratic form is always diagonalizable.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top