Simulation of dual porosity in coal using COMSOL Multiphysic

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around simulating dual porosity in coal using COMSOL Multiphysics, specifically focusing on the interaction between coal matrix and fracture flow. Participants are exploring the challenges of defining boundary conditions and geometry for separate domains representing matrix and fractures.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Nima expresses difficulty in assigning separate domains with different pressures for the coal matrix and fractures, and seeks guidance on coupling fracture and matrix flow in COMSOL.
  • Another participant questions the definitions of fracture and matrix flow, indicating a lack of clarity on these terms.
  • Nima clarifies that he needs to couple diffusion in the coal matrix with Darcy flow in the fractures, explaining the process of gas diffusion and flow in coal.
  • Nima is uncertain about how to define the geometry and whether he can use the fracture flow module alongside the porous media and subsurface flow module in COMSOL.
  • Sikandar suggests that COMSOL may not directly solve for dual porosity and notes limitations of the poroelasticity module for single porosity modeling. He also mentions that the fracture flow module may only apply at boundaries and questions whether Nima has successfully coupled matrix and fracture flow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus, as there are differing views on the capabilities of COMSOL regarding dual porosity modeling and the definitions of key terms related to the simulation.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the definitions of fracture and matrix flow, as well as uncertainties about the appropriate geometry and modules to use in COMSOL for this specific simulation.

Nima7871
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I would kindly appreciate it if someone could help me with my simulation problem. I am trying to simulate dual porosity in coal and the interaction of coal matrix and fracture flow. The problem I'm having is I can't assign separate domains with different pressures for matrix and fracture in coal (I don't know how to define boundary conditions for matrix and fractures for different domains). In other words, I do not know how to couple fracture and matrix flow in COMSOL settings.

Regards,
Nima
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Hyo,

Thanks very much for your reply. I need to couple two phenomena namely diffusion in coal matrix and Darcy flow in fracture. These are technical terms for geotechnical problems. The gas in coal is stored in matrix which is then diffused into coal fracture due to pressure gradient and then is driven through the cleats (Fractures) around coal matrix through Darcy flow. I need to define two separate domains in my model with two different pressures, representing coal matrix and fractures. I do not know how to define my geometry and not too sure if I can use fracture flow module under porous media and subsurface flow module in COMSOL. I might be able to define boundary conditions once I can create appropriate geometry and use the right flow module. I think I first need to come up with the right geometry which I'm not clear about.

Regards,
Nima
 
Hi Nema

I think comsol didn't solve for dual porosity directly because the poroelasticity module is only for single porosity modeling. Also if you can check the fracture flow module can not simulate and assign the fractures in a 3 D model. Fracture flow can only be applied at the boundaries. Did you tried it (means did you have coupled the matrix and fracture flow?). I am working on the same topic and facing the same problem.

Sikandar
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K