Single conservative force acting on a particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the potential energy function U(x) for a particle under a conservative force represented by F = -Ax + Bx^2. Participants express uncertainty about the limits of integration, specifically where to start the integration to find U. It is clarified that the lower limit should be at a known potential energy point, typically U=0 at x=0, while the upper limit can be defined based on the problem's requirements. A suggestion is made to use a different variable for integration to avoid confusion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting integration limits for accurate potential energy calculations.
Robb
Messages
225
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


upload_2015-10-25_16-55-4.png


Homework Equations


U(final)(x)= (-) Integral F dx + U(initial)
Integration from (x-initial to x-final)

The Attempt at a Solution



U(final)(x)= (-) integral (-Ax+Bx^2)dx

Not sure on limits of integration
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to start the integration at a place where U is known. What place is that?

If you want to give the value of U at location coordinate x, what is the upper limit of integration?
 
Not sure. Lower = 0. upper x=2.00 & x=3.00?
 
I was referring to part (a). There is no 2.00 or 3.00 in part (a). Once you have solved part (a), part (b) is just a question of substitution and subtraction.
I think you may be confusing yourself by mislabelling your integration variables.
You wrote:

U(final)(x)= (-) Integral F dx + U(initial)

That can't be right because the LHS depends on X while the RHS does not. By using x as the integration variable you make it disappear once the integral is taken. Instead use y as your integration variable and x as one of your limits of integration. Which one?
 
So, my potential energy function is U(x) = (-) integral F dx = (-) integral (-Ax+Bx^2) dx = 1/2Ax^2 + 1/3 BX^3

U=0 @ x=0

Though I am seeing this as a lower limit
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top