Single slit diffraction pattern in 2D

AI Thread Summary
Single slit diffraction can be observed in two dimensions, creating distinct horizontal and vertical patterns. The absence of diffraction patterns across the entire viewing screen is due to the principles of constructive and destructive interference. Each point on the slit acts as a source of spherical wavelets, but only specific angles produce observable patterns. The textbook emphasizes the 3D nature of wave propagation, which complicates the expected uniformity on the screen. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the nuances of diffraction phenomena.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was looking at previous exams and I saw a question with single slit diffraction. Please look at picture.

So, this made me think: "Wow, I never thought single slit diffraction could be applied in 2D with one pattern horizontal and the other vertical."

Then, I thought why is there no diffraction patterns along all the surface of the viewing screen. Can anyone explain why? The textbook I am using emphasizes how when a wave enters a boundary place, each point sends out its own spherical wavelet in 3D. So, why don't we see that on the viewing screen?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-07-28 at 11.07.57 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-07-28 at 11.07.57 AM.png
    18.8 KB · Views: 571
Physics news on Phys.org
Constructive and destructive interference I presume. You can draw it, we did this in first year undergrad.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Diffraction pattern from a grating
Replies
3
Views
781
Problem on Diffraction Grating and Laser Crystallography
Replies
10
Views
2K
Derivation of single slit diffraction formula
Replies
9
Views
2K
The Difference Between Diffraction And Interference Patterns
Replies
3
Views
2K
Single/double slit diffraction intensity
Replies
3
Views
2K
Hair/wire laser diffraction interference pattern
Replies
5
Views
3K
Single-sit vs. Double-slit vs. Diffraction grating
Replies
4
Views
4K
Relationship of slit, wavelength, and intensity
Replies
5
Views
4K
Single slit double slit and diffraction grating
Replies
3
Views
13K
Single Slit Interference Pattern: Increased Distance
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top