Sizing Needle Valves for Air Flow | 0.025 m^3/s

AI Thread Summary
Sizing a needle valve for a required air flow rate of 0.025 m^3/s at an upstream pressure of 2 atm involves understanding the valve's flow coefficient (Cv) and the pressure drop (DP) across the valve. The outlet pressure (P2) is influenced by the valve's characteristics, making it challenging to determine without prior knowledge of the valve's performance. The Cv value provides a basis for calculating flow rates, but it does not directly indicate the pressure drop, which varies with flow conditions. Iterative calculations may be necessary to accurately assess the valve's impact on flow, and reliance on charts or empirical data can aid in estimating pressure losses. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective valve selection and flow management.
Kimusubi
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am trying to size a needle valve to make sure that it can allow the required flow rate at the fully open position (0.025 m^3/s). For a given Cv you should be able to calculate the maximum flow rate through the needle valve provided that you know the temperature of the gas and the pressure drop across the valve, but my problem is that I do not know what the outlet pressure of the needle valve is going to be ahead of time. Wouldn't P2 (outlet pressure) be dependent upon the needle valve itself? I seem to be confused on this point which is preventing me to get the correct size for the valve.

The flow conditions are:

Medium: Air
Upstream Pressure: 2 atm
Maximum flow rate required: 0.025 m^3/s
T = 300 K


Any help would be highly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
0.025 m^3/s is 25 liters per second. Even assuming air as the fluid, that's some needle valve.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Needle_valve

Needle valves are used for relatively low flow rates.

When flowing air through a needle valve, you will also need to be aware that choked flow may develop, which will limit the maximum flow rate thru the valve. You are going to need to know the pressure drop characteristics of the valve in order to determine what the outlet pressure is.
 
Yeah, it seems to be that way. I chose a needle valve for its ability to finely adjust the flow rate. Do you know why the manufacturers only give the Cv and not the DP across the valve? If you need to know about the pressure drop across the valve in order to calculate the volumetric flow rate, then what good is it to only have the Cv (flow coefficient) value? Or is there something else that I am missing?
 
Cv is the DP across the valve. Cv = Q * Sqrt(SG / DP). However, because the pressure loss depends on the flow, it's impossible to say "this valve has a loss of X psi" as that value changes with the flow conditions. The valve has a specific geometry, and they have tested that valve in a multitude of conditions in order to come up with its Cv value for various open/closed positions. Instead of saying "You'll see a pressure drop of X psi in water with a flow rate of Y when the needle is in Z position" they can just say, "The Cv is 50 in that position" and that tells you, the piping engineer/designer/guy everything you need to know to work your calculations for your specific pipe geometry.

Calculating things like this isn't always straight forward, sometimes you have to use iterative processes. Control valves typically require iteration (or that you select a valve based on a desired Cv). If you know the discharge conditions (atmosphere, pressure vessel, etc) and the inlet conditions, and you know the geometry of the piping, then you can work your way through the calculations to try to hone in on the effect of the valve on flow.
 
edit, sorry I thought this was water.
 
Last edited:
Well, I figured there would be charts/plots that would give the dP for various incoming flow velocities and pressures. I did find some relations in regards to the pressure loss based on the Cv (from the Handbook of Valve Selection). I am not sure on how accurate it is, but it states that

dP = z*0.5*rho*V^2 (where z is resistance coefficient)
z = (899*d^4)/Cv^2 (where d is the orifice diameter in inches)

When running this for a Cv = 1.31, D = 3.12", and V = 15.51 m/s, I get a total head loss of only 0.1044 psi. Given the following equation (for gases):

Q = (Cv*1360*(dp*P2)^0.5)/sqrt(SG*T) (where P2 = P1 - dP, SG = specific gravity, and T is temperature in Rankine)

I only get a 127 SCFH which comes down to almost nothing when corrected for pressure and temperature (~ 1 ft^3/min). This corresponds to 0.0005003 m^3/s, which when taking into account the 0.312" diameter, means that the valve allows only 10.14 m/s velocity through. Is there really a 5 m/s flow loss across the valve? That seems extremely unreasonable.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top