Skiing: Calculating Speed and Friction Coefficient

  • Thread starter Thread starter st3dent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
AI Thread Summary
A skier descends from a peak of 850m to a lower peak of 750m over a distance of 3.2km with an average slope of 30 degrees. The calculated speed upon reaching the lower peak, without using poles, is 44.27 m/s. To determine the maximum tolerable coefficient of friction that allows the skier to just reach the lower peak with zero velocity, calculations show that the coefficient of friction is approximately 0.036. This value is derived from the work-energy principle, considering the energy lost due to friction over the distance traveled. The discussion confirms the accuracy of the calculations and the final result for the friction coefficient.
st3dent
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
2. Two mountains are at elevations of 850m and 750m above the valley between them. A ski run extends from the top of the higher peak to the top of the lower one, with a total length of 3.2km and an average slope of 30 degrees,
a) A skier starts from rest on the higher peak. At what speed will be arrive at the top of the lower peak if he just coasts without using poles?
b)How large a coefficient of friction would be tolerable without preventing him from reaching the lower peak?

what I've done:
2a) (m)(9.8)(850) = (m)(9.8)(750) + (0.5)(m)(vf^2)
vf^2 = 1960
vf = 44.27 m/s

b)I am stuck on this one.

Thanks in advance for your help.
 

Attachments

  • question1.jpg
    question1.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 621
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume that the skier just arrives at the second peak with 0 velocity. How much energy must he/she have lost? Okay, now use "energy = force*distance" to calculate the friction force necessary to account for that energy loss.
 
(a) looks right, I didn't check your calculation but the formula is correct.

As for (b), let's write down the work-energy equation:

W_{friction} = \Delta E_m = \Delta E_p + \Delta E_k

Our worst case scenario would be if the coefficient of friction would be so large, that the skier would reach the lower peak just barely - without any speed. In that case his kinetic energy would be 0 at first (since he starts from rest) and 0 at the end (since he has no speed when he reaches the peak):

W_f = (mgh_2 - mgh_1) + (0 - 0) = mg(750m - 850m) = -100mg

Now what is the work of friction? It is the force of friction times the distance, which is 3.2km or 3,200 meters. Don't forget the work is negative, though, because the force vector is directly opposite to the distance vector all the time:

-xf_k = -3200f_k = -100mg

f_k = N\mu _k = \frac{100mg}{3200} = \frac{mg}{32}

\mu _k = \frac{mg}{32N}

Now all you have to do is find the normal force, N...
 
I understand the following:

Since the change in kinetic energy is zero,
Ei = Ef
mgh1 = mgh2 + Ffrd
mgh1 - mgh2 = Ffrd
mg(750 - 850) = Ffrd

Since Ffrd = \mu _kFnd

Fnd = mg(750 - 850)
Fn = -100mg / d
Fn = -100mg/-3200
Fn = mg/32

AS;
Ek = 0.5mv2

In part a), i found the speed of the skier at the top of the second slope to be 44.27 m/s.
Then,
(m)(9.8)(850) = (m)(9.8)(750) + (0.5)(m)(v2)
(m)(9.8)(850) = (m)(9.8)(750) + (0.5)(m)(44.272)
However, i can't solve for m, since it cancels out.

I do know that the force down the slop is mgsin30 and that
Fn, the normal force, is mgcos30. But how can i use this to solve this problem?
 
Last edited:
I THINK I have a solution now.

Since Ffrd = mg / 32
and Ffr = \mu _kmgcos30

then \mu _kmgcos30 = mg/32
\mu _k = mg/32mgcos30
\mu _k = 1/32cos30
\mu _k = 0.036

Is that the right answer...THANKS!
 
Yes, 0.036.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top