Sliding down a ramp against friction force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in kinetic energy of a body sliding down a ramp with friction. The potential energy at the top is given by Epot = mgh, while the frictional energy is Efric = f * s, where f is the friction force. The relationship between these energies is expressed as Ekin = Epot - Efric. Participants discuss how to set up the equation for the change in kinetic energy by considering the initial and final kinetic energy values. The emphasis is placed on understanding the work done by friction in this energy transformation.
Vader07
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At the top of the ramp the body is stopped and then released. It slides down the ramp against a friction force of f= 10 Newtons. Find the body's change in kinetic energy in Joules after traveling a distance s= 3 m down the ramp.


Homework Equations




There are three types of energy:

1) potential energy: Epot : the body is on top of the ramp (height h) at rest. The energy is Epot = mgh
2) frictional energy: Efric = cmg*cos alpha *s (= frictional force multiplied by the distance s that the body had gone down the ramp at a certain point.)
3) kinetic energy: Ekin = 1/2 mgv^2 : let's you calculate the velocity of the body.

The three energies are related in the following way:
Epot = Efric + Ekin, -->
Ekin = Epot - Efric .


The Attempt at a Solution



KE = 1/2mgv^2
KE = 1/2(1)(9.8)^2
= 1/2(96.04)
= 49.04

F1 = (1)(9.8)sin(alpha)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the change in kinetic energy is simply going to be your change in potential energy minus the energy lost to friction(Or the work done by friction). With emphasis on work.
 
dacruick


thanks for the reply. could you help me set the equation for this change in kinetic energy. I am sort of lost on this.
 
just take the kinetic energy at the start and the kinetic energy at the end, and then find the difference. do you know the equation for kinetic energy?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top