Slipping Ladder Angular Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a meterstick slipping down a wall, with the setup involving forces like normal force and friction. The participant has drawn a free body diagram and is attempting to sum the torques but struggles with incorporating static and kinetic friction. It is noted that finding the coefficient of kinetic friction is challenging without first determining the angular acceleration through other means. Suggestions include treating static and kinetic friction as equal for simplification and emphasizing that the angular acceleration will not be constant as the meterstick slips. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the need for a function of position or time to accurately describe the angular acceleration.
SoNiiC
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The following problem is part of a physics lab with unclear directions. The lab prompt says: Find the angular acceleration of a meterstick as it slips down a wall. Here is my interpretation of the lab: A meterstick of mass 0.15kg is leaning against the wall. At an angle of 30 degrees, it begins to slip until it hits the floor. During this time, what is the angular acceleration of the center of the meterstick?

Homework Equations


Sum of Torques = Moment of Inertia * Angular acceleration.
Moment of Inertia of center of meterstick = 1/12 ML^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with a free body diagram and drew the forces for the Normal force of the wall, mass of meterstick, normal force of the floor, and static friction. My plan of action was to sum the torques of the ladder and then divide them by the moment of inertia, giving me the angular acceleration. However, I am having some trouble with the torques as I am not certain on how to take static and kinetic friction into account. What I do know is that at the moment of equilibrium, the normal force of the wall would be equal to the force of static friction. However, as soon as normal force of the wall (mg/tan(theta)) is greater than the force of kinetic friction (uk*normal force of the floor), the friction changes to static. By setting these two equations equal I can solve for the force of static friction since theta is known to be 30. However, what I really need in order to sum the torques is the force from kinetic friction. Is there any way for me to do so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite clear - are you saying you do not know the coefficient of kinetic friction, so you are looking for some way to calculate it, then from that calculate the acceleration?
If so, there is no way. The only way to find the kinetic coefficient will be to find the acceleration first some other way, e.g. from the time to hit the ground.
 
haruspex said:
Not quite clear - are you saying you do not know the coefficient of kinetic friction, so you are looking for some way to calculate it, then from that calculate the acceleration?
If so, there is no way. The only way to find the kinetic coefficient will be to find the acceleration first some other way, e.g. from the time to hit the ground.

Would it be possible for me to do this problem if I just let the static and kinetic friction be the same thing?
 
SoNiiC said:
Would it be possible for me to do this problem if I just let the static and kinetic friction be the same thing?
Yes, as a function of position. If you want it as a function of time that may be a problem. With the two coefficients the same, and starting from only just slipping (an infinitesimal net torque) you may find the time to reach a given point is theoretically infinite.
 
Assuming no wall friction:
I found the value of the friction coefficient by setting the sum of the torques equal to 0 (since i knew the mass and angle) (Torque = 0 = mg(L/2)costheta - mg(friction coefficient)(L)sin theta.) However, this dosent help with the rest of the problem at all (I was planning on finding the torque and then diving it by the moment of inertia to find angular acceleration).

Assuming wall friction:
Another thing i could do would be top set the wall friction and the floor friction equal to each other, cancelling friction out of the equation completely. Torque = mg(L/2)sin theta. However, I don't think this is correct either.

The only other way that I can think of doing this problem is by just setting a = g; perpendicular acceleration = gcostheta and dividing by the radius to find the angular acceleration. However, this would be inaccurate due to friction on the bottom part of the ladder.

Any ideas?
 
Your problem statement says you are to find the angular acceleration "as it slips down the wall". It will not be constant, so you need to find it either as a function of position, or of angle, or of time. If the torque starts off only infinitesimally exceeding frictional torque, the initial acceleration will be zero.
Try to find the torque at some angle theta.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top