Slowing a Mass with a Spring Collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a mass colliding with a spring and the timing of its motion. The key point is that the mass reaches its maximum speed at the equilibrium position of the spring when it first contacts it. The book states that the mass comes to rest after one-fourth of a cycle of simple harmonic motion, which corresponds to the spring's compression. This is clarified by noting that the spring starts from the equilibrium position, not maximum amplitude, leading to the mass slowing to zero at the end of that quarter cycle. Understanding this concept resolves the initial confusion about the timing of the spring's motion.
Coop
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1.5 kg mass slides across a horizontal, frictionless surface at a speed of 2.0 m/s until it collides with and sticks to the free end of a spring with spring constant 50 N/m. The spring's other end is anchored to the wall. How far has the spring compressed when the mass, at least for an instant, is at rest? How much time does it take for the spring to compress to this point?

I don't care about the first part of the question. I am just looking at the second question.

Homework Equations



T (period) = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}

m = mass on the spring
k = spring constant

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer in my book says to set t_{f} = \frac{1}{4}T, stating "the motion of the mass until it stops is 1/4 of a cycle of simple harmonic motion." This is why I am confused, isn't the spring only momentarily at rest at the beginning, end and halfway through the period? Isn't the book saying the spring is momentarily at rest one-forth of the way through the period? I don't see why this is true.

Thanks,
Coop
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this particular problem, the mass is moving at its top speed when it first contacts the spring and sticks to it. In SHM, the top speed is attained at the equilibrium position. So the point where the mass sticks to the spring will eventually become the equilibrium position. 1/4 of a cycle later, it has slowed to zero, and the spring begins to rebound. 1/4 cycle later, it is again passing through the equilibrium position, and exhibiting the maximum velocity in the other direction; also, at this point, the spring is no longer compressed. During the next 1/4 cycle, the spring begins stretching out, and the mass starts to slow down again, with the mass moving in the direction opposite to its original direction. By the end of this 1/4 cycle, the velocity is again zero, and the string exhibits its maximum stretch. During the next 1/4 cycle, the mass moves in its original direction again, speeding up. By the end of this 1/4 cycle, it again reaches the equilibrium position with maximum velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Chestermiller said:
In this particular problem, the mass is moving at its top speed when it first contacts the spring and sticks to it. In SHM, the top speed is attained at the equilibrium position. So the point where the mass sticks to the spring will eventually become the equilibrium position. 1/4 of a cycle later, it has slowed to zero, and the spring begins to rebound. 1/4 cycle later, it is again passing through the equilibrium position, and exhibiting the maximum velocity in the other direction; also, at this point, the spring is no longer compressed. During the next 1/4 cycle, the spring begins stretching out, and the mass starts to slow down again, with the mass moving in the direction opposite to its original direction. By the end of this 1/4 cycle, the velocity is again zero, and the string exhibits its maximum stretch. During the next 1/4 cycle, the mass moves in its original direction again, speeding up. By the end of this 1/4 cycle, it again reaches the equilibrium position with maximum velocity.

Oh I see, I was thinking the spring was starting from it's maximum amplitude, but it's not; it's starting at its eq. point. Thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top