Small oscillations: diagonal matrix

bznm
Messages
181
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm solving an exercise about small oscillations.

I name T the kinetic matrix and $H$ the hessian matrix of potential.

The matrix \omega^2 T- H is diagonal and so find the auto-frequencies is easy! But I have a problem with normal modes. The lagrangian coordinates are two angles, \theta and \phi.

$$\omega^2T-H(\theta, \phi)=\begin{pmatrix}m\omega^2-m \Omega &&&0 \\
0&&&M\omega^2-k
\end{pmatrix}$$

Normal modes are given by splitted oscillations of the two coordinates. Is it correct? Are they given by:
\theta(t)=A_1 \cos(\Omega t+ \alpha_1) and \phi(t)=A_2(\cos \frac{k}{M} t+\alpha_2)? (A_1, A_2= constants depending on initial conditions)

And is the general solution of motion given by $$\theta(t)+\phi(t)=A_1 \cos(\Omega t+ \alpha_1)+A_2(\cos \frac{k}{M} t+\alpha_2)$$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
looks pretty good. Except one slight mistake. hint: check the values of omega.
 
BruceW said:
looks pretty good. Except one slight mistake. hint: check the values of omega.

Thanks for your answer!
I have forgotten the square for ω..

But I have a doubt:
If I find the eigenvectors, I obtain:

- If \omega^2=\Omega
the eigenvector is (μ_1,0)

- if \omega^2=k/M
the eigenvector is (0, μ_2)

where μ_1 and μ_2 belong to ℝ.

So, the correct solution of motion, introduced the q_i coordinates that shift the origin of the system in the point of equilibrium, should be:

{\bf q}(t)=A_1 cos (\sqrt(\omega)t+\alpha_1) \begin{pmatrix}\mu_1\\0 \end{pmatrix}+A_2 cos (\sqrt(k/M)t+\alpha_2) \begin{pmatrix}0\\μ_2 \end{pmatrix}

is it correct? thanks again
 
Last edited:
yeah, that all agrees with the matrix equation you wrote in the first post. Except one thing. You have written the eigenvectors the wrong way around. The whole idea of the normal mode method is that the matrix you wrote, when acting on an eigenvector, should give a zero vector. So when omega squared equal k/M, then what should the eigenvector be?

Edit: woops, ah sorry sorry. You did write them the correct way around. I didn't take the time to look at the matrix product carefully enough. So all your work is correct.
 
Thank you so much!
 
no worries! you had pretty much done it already.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top