Small sphere rolling off the top of a large sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter myko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling Sphere
AI Thread Summary
A small uniform solid sphere rolls down a larger fixed sphere after a slight disturbance, and the discussion focuses on determining the height at which the small sphere loses contact with the larger one. The initial attempts involve applying Newton's second law and conservation of energy, but there is confusion regarding the inclusion of rotational kinetic energy in the calculations. Key equations discussed include the relationship between speed, gravitational potential energy, and the moment of inertia of the small sphere. Participants suggest expressing the angle of separation and height in terms of known variables to simplify the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly accounting for rotational dynamics in the energy conservation equation.
myko
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
[>A heavy sphere of radius r = 1.00 meter is fixed with respect to the ground. A small uniform solid sphere is placed at the top of the larger sphere. After a slight disturbance, the smaller sphere begins to roll downward without slipping. How high h is the small sphere above the ground at the instant it loses contact with the large sphere



My atempt of solution:

I think, that at the moment when it loses contact, speed of the small sphere is higher than the one in $\Sigma F=mg\cos\theta=mv^2/r$. $\theta r$ is an arc traveled on the sphere. Also since it falls without slipping, $v=\omega r$, where $\omega$ is the angular velocity of the small sphere. The speed at a height h can be found from $$mg(2r)=1/2mv^2+mgh.$$

From foce equation I would get $$v=\sqrt{rg\cos\theta}$$
And from energy conservation:
$$h=\frac{4g-v^2}{2g}$$
substituting the expretion for velocity
$$h=\frac{4-r\cos\theta}{2}$$

I am not sure if this is correct or no. And I can't express $\theta$ in some other way. Could anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you forgotten about rotational kinetic energy? The small sphere rotates; this will consume energy. Your conservation of energy equation will be slightly different.
 
$$mg(2r)=1/2mv^2+1/2I\omega^2+mgh$$$$h=\frac{2rg-7/10v^2}{g}$$

also $$h=1+cos\theta$

and now I would substitute v. Is that right?
 
Last edited:
myko said:
$$mg(2r)=1/2mv^2+1/2I\omega^2+mgh$$


$$h=\frac{2rg-7/10v^2}{g}$$

also $$h=1+cos\theta$

and now?

Let ##m## and ##r## be the mass and radius of the small sphere. You need to express ##I## and ##\omega## in terms of ##m##, ##r## and ##v##.

Also, working with ##h## is more complicated; find ##\theta##, the angle at the center of the large sphere such that the spheres just begin to separate, then convert that to a height.
 
Ok, ty. I got it.
 
Hi
I'm working in the same problem and tnx i got it
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top