Snell's law, critical angle & refraction

AI Thread Summary
To determine the critical angle between layers with velocities v_1=1.5 km/s and v_2=1.3 km/s, the relationship sin(θ_c) = v_2/v_1 is used, leading to a value greater than 1, which is problematic. According to Snell's law, the critical angle occurs when the refracted angle θ_2 is 90 degrees, simplifying the equation to sin(θ_c) = n_2/n_1. The confusion arises from the refractive indices, where n is defined as the speed of light in a vacuum divided by the speed in the medium, leading to the conclusion that the velocities correspond to their respective indices. Clarification on the indices and their relationship to velocity is essential for solving the problem correctly. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately applying Snell's law in multi-layer models.
sveioen
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a three layer model

-------------------------------------------------
v_1=1.5km/s
-------------------------------------------------
v_2=1.3km/s
-------------------------------------------------
v_3=2.0km/s

Assume a ray goes through layer 1 and hits the interface between layer 1 and layer 2. What is the critical angle?

Homework Equations



Snells law
\frac{\sin \theta_1}{\sin \theta_2}=\frac{v_1}{v_2}

The Attempt at a Solution



To find the critical angle, you normally take \sin \theta_c = \frac{v_1}{v_2}=\frac{1.5}{1.3}. But in this case that means I have to take \sin^{-1} of a value that is over 1! How do I solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to Snell's law
n1sin(θ1) = n2sin(θ2)

If θ1 is θc, then θ2 = 90 degrees.

So sin(θc) = n2/n1
 
rl.bhat said:
According to Snell's law
n1sin(θ1) = n2sin(θ2)

If θ1 is θc, then θ2 = 90 degrees.

So sin(θc) = n2/n1

When I look up Snell's law on Wikipedia it says

<br /> \frac{\sin \theta_1}{\sin \theta_2}=\frac{v_1}{v_2}=\frac{n_2}{n_1}<br />

Why does the subscript change in the n_n ? Isnt v_1=n_1 and v_2=n_2?

Thanks for answering
 
According to the definition,
refractive index n = c/v. where c is the velocity of light in vacuum and v is the velocity in the refracting medium.
So v = c/n
Or v1 = c/n1 and v2 = c/n2
then v1/v2 = ...?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top