Solar day and the amount of Earth's rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter james gander
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Solar
AI Thread Summary
A solar day is defined as 24 hours and is based on the position of the sun, while a sidereal day lasts 23 hours and 56 minutes, based on the position of the stars. Due to Earth's orbit around the sun, it must rotate slightly more than 360 degrees each day to account for the sun's apparent movement in the sky. This extra rotation is necessary for the sun to return to the same position in the sky at the end of a solar day. In terms of degrees, the Earth rotates approximately 361 degrees in a solar day when measured against inertial space, but only 360 degrees relative to the sun. Understanding this difference clarifies the relationship between solar and sidereal days.
james gander
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Hi. I am confused about something and it is making me feel rather stupid.

First of all i will explain what i know. I know a solar day is 24hrs long and it is defined by the position of the sun. I also know a sidereal day is 23h 56m and is defined by the postition of the stars (basically).

The problem i have is with the solar day. As the Earth rotates it also orbits the sun, and because of that orbit the Earth has to rotate a little further each day. If it didnt then the sun would be in a different place.

I can see in a sidereal day the Earth roates 360 deg, however a solar day must be more then 360 degrees surely?

Sorry for such an infantile question but is it just simply that a the Earth rotates more then 360 in a solar day?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
james gander said:
is it just simply that a the Earth rotates more then 360 in a solar day?
Yes.

This is similar to how hands of a clock move. Imagine both hands of the clock start at 12 o'clock.
Think of how far the minute hand moves in an hour (back to the number 12 on the clock). This is analogous to the sidereal day, as the numbers are static, just like the background stars.
Now think how far it has to move to catch up with the hour hand. This is analogous to the solar day, where the hour hand represents the sun moving across the sky w/r to the fixed stars, due to Earth's orbit.

Every full 12 hours, the hands meet only 11 times. Similarly, every year has exactly one less solar day than sidereal days (ignoring other factors, like precession of equinoxes).
 
Bandersnatch said:
Yes.

This is similar to how hands of a clock move. Imagine both hands of the clock start at 12 o'clock.
Think of how far the minute hand moves in an hour (back to the number 12 on the clock). This is analogous to the sidereal day, as the numbers are static, just like the background stars.
Now think how far it has to move to catch up with the hour hand. This is analogous to the solar day, where the hour hand represents the sun moving across the sky w/r to the fixed stars, due to Earth's orbit.

Every full 12 hours, the hands meet only 11 times. Similarly, every year has exactly one less solar day than sidereal days (ignoring other factors, like precession of equinoxes).
Yes thought so , just thought i would check. Google says the Earth rotates 360 degrees in a solar day and that is what was annoying me. thanks
 
Just to confirm. The Earth rotates on its axis by approximately (24*60*60)/(23*60*60+56*60) * 360 = 361.0 degrees in a solar day.
 
phyzguy said:
Just to confirm. The Earth rotates on its axis by approximately (24*60*60)/(23*60*60+56*60) * 360 = 361.0 degrees in a solar day.
Rotates with respect to what?

With respect to inertial space, yes, the Earth rotates by about 361 degrees in a mean solar day (86400 seconds). But with respect to the Sun, the Earth rotates by about 360 degrees in a mean solar day.
 
D H said:
Rotates with respect to what?

With respect to inertial space, yes, the Earth rotates by about 361 degrees in a mean solar day (86400 seconds). But with respect to the Sun, the Earth rotates by about 360 degrees in a mean solar day.

Agreed.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top