Solenoid and toroid inductance puzzle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of calculating the inductance of solenoids, particularly when introducing air gaps into toroidal designs. The original poster questions the validity of established equations for inductance, noting that the presence of air significantly alters the magnetic circuit and the resulting B field. Participants clarify that while traditional equations may not account for these gaps accurately, adjustments can be made to better reflect the magnetic properties of the materials involved. They emphasize that the inductance calculations must consider both the iron and air components, leading to a more nuanced understanding of magnetic energy distribution. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of magnetic circuits in engineering applications.
phy5m2w
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Im working with building a reluctance motor and I've posed a problem to myself that i cannot answer without questioning some long accepted facts about the inductance of a solenoid.

The simple solenoid and toroidal solenoid are two shapes that seem to have simple equations for calculating the inductance/B field.
e.g:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/indtor.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/indsol.html

for my puzzle see attachment...

Panel 1:
I start with the inductance of a toroid, a completed magnetic circuit which has a inductance and B field for which I agree with the online equation as quoted.

Panel 2:
I add an airgap in the toroid. The magnetic circuit now has a break in it, so the complete circuit needs to take into account for the air and the iron that it passes through. This is done using the reluctance of the two materials, the metal and the air. the result presented as i understand it, now 1/4 of the flux path is in air.

Panel 3:
A 'simple' solenoid where over half the flux path must be through the air. since the relative permeability of the air is so much smaller this part should be the dominent term. making the B field considerably smaller than the value normally quoted!

I have not neglected to include effects of the obvious change in area that the flux is passing through when it is not 'confined' to the metal, so this is oversimplified... BUT this does not explain away the piece of physics that I am questioning here.


Have I made a foolish mistake here or has virtually every physicist/engineer in history learned something that's fundamentally wrong? which i find hard to believe.


This has confused me for far too long, which is it?

Woody
 

Attachments

  • inductance thought experiment.jpg
    inductance thought experiment.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 927
Engineering news on Phys.org
The inductance of a gapped toroid can be calculated by equating the stored electrical energy ½LI2 and the stored magnetic energy ½∫BH dV:

\frac{1}{2}LI^2=\frac{1}{2}\int_V BHdV = \frac{\mu\mu_0}{2}\frac{A_i_r_o_nN^2I^2}{\ell_i_r_o_n}+\frac{\mu_0}{2}\frac{A_g_a_pN^2I^2}{\ell_g_a_p}

where H=NI/\ell and B = μH in gap and μμ0H in iron, Airon and Agap are the cross sectionional areas of the flux, and volume V =2 πrA, and 2\pi r = \ell_g_a_p + \ell_i_r_o_n. Rewriting, we get

L = \mu_0N^2[\frac{\mu A_i_r_o_n}{\ell_i_r_o_n}+\frac{A_g_a_p}{\ell_g_a_p}]

Agap is larger than Airon because Blongitudinal is continuous in the iron and gap, while Hparallel is continuous across the iron-gap boundary.
This leades to "refraction" and Snell's Law across the iron-gap boundary, just like light in glass.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
Bob S said:
L = \mu_0N^2[\frac{\mu A_i_r_o_n}{\ell_i_r_o_n}+\frac{A_g_a_p}{\ell_g_a_p}]

So.. If we imagine that lgap is very small, then the equation should become equal to the original toroid equation. Agap will approximately equal to Airon. So... the second term in that equation appears to blow up rather than diminish to zero as should be expected.

and yes... I had an equation that produced that mistake at some point, which I think is in part what lead me to the original problem described.
 
You are right. The correct solution is shown in the thumbnail. Basically, although

\int_C H d\ell = NI

H is not continuous around the loop C, so H≠ NI/ l. Only B is continuous. Equation (5) in the thumbnail shows the correct result.

Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Magnet_air_gap.jpg
    Magnet_air_gap.jpg
    52.6 KB · Views: 867
So... back to my original question:

Does this imply that the inductance of a solenoid, frequently quoted in textbooks, is actually wrong? as in panel 3 in my original post
 
Calculating the inductance of a solenoid with iron is very difficult, but for a magnetic circuit with a small gap like the thumbnail in my previous post, the calculation is the following. Use the relation

\frac{1}{2}LI^2=\frac{1}{2\mu\mu_0}\int_VB^2\;dV_v_o_l=\frac{1}{2\mu\mu_0}\int_VB^2\;dV_i_r_o_n+\frac{1}{2\mu_0}\int_VB^2\;dV_g_a_p

for the stored energy in the iron and a small gap, and use (from the thumbnail in my previous post)

B=\frac{\mu\mu_0NI}{\ell_i_r_o_n+\mu\ell_g_a_p}

for the magnetic field in both the iron and the gap. Here, \ell = \ell_i_r_o_n +\ell_g_a_p. Turn the crank and get an expression for the inductance L.
This does not correctly handle the fringe field in the gap for a large gap, but an adjustment in the cross sectional area in the gap should improve the accuracy.

In an air-filled solenoid, half the stored magnetic energy is inside the solenoid, and half outside. For a solenoid with the interior filled with iron, nearly all the magnetic energy is outside.

Here is the on-axis field inside a short air-filled solenoid.

http://www.netdenizen.com/emagnettest/solenoids/?solenoid

For short air-filled solenoids (single-turn loops), you should look at Smythe Static and Dynamic Electricity (Third Edition) page 339. For N turns, multiply by N2.

[added] For the integration, use V_i_r_o_n=A_i_r_o_n\ell_i_r_o_n\;\;and\;\;V_g_a_p=A_g_a_p\ell_g_a_p

For small gaps, \;\;\;A_i_r_o_n=A_g_a_p

Bob S
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top