Solid state physics, exercise about reciprocal lattice

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


Hi guys, I don't reach the correct answer to an exercise. I'm following Ashcroft's book.
I must find that the reciprocal of the bcc Bravais lattice is a fcc one and the reciprocal of the fcc Bravais lattice is a bcc one.


Homework Equations



If a_1, a_2 and a_3 are vectors spaning the Bravais lattice, then the reciprocal lattice is spanned by the vectors b_1= 2 \pi \frac{a_2 \times a_3}{a_1 \cdot (a_2 \times a_3)}, b_2= 2 \pi \frac{a_3 \times a_1}{a_1 \cdot (a_2 \times a_3)} and b_3= 2 \pi \frac{a_1 \times a_2}{a_1 \cdot (a_2 \times a_3)}

The Attempt at a Solution


For a bcc lattice: a_1=\frac{a}{2}(\hat y +\hat z-\hat x ), a_2=\frac{a}{2}(\hat z +\hat x-\hat y ) and a_3=\frac{a}{2}(\hat x +\hat y-\hat z ).
While for a fcc lattice, a_1=\frac{a}{2}(\hat y +\hat z), a_2=\frac{a}{2}(\hat z +\hat x ) and a_3=\frac{a}{2}(\hat y +\hat x ).
I first tried to show that the reciprocal of the fcc lattice is a bcc lattice. So I just used the formulae given but didn't reach what I should have.
b_1=2\pi \frac{[ \frac{a}{2}(\hat z + \hat x )] \times [ \frac{a}{2} (\hat x + \hat y ) ]}{[\frac{a}{2} (\hat y + \hat x )] \cdot [ \frac{a}{2} (\hat z + \hat x ) \times \frac{a}{2} (\hat x + \hat y ) ] }.
I calculated (\hat z + \hat x ) \times (\hat x + \hat y ) to be worth \hat y + \hat z. So that I reached that b_1=\frac{4 \pi }{a} (\hat y + \hat z ). This is already wrong, according to the book I should have reached b_1=\frac{4 \pi }{a} \cdot \frac{1}{2} (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x ).
I have no clue on what I've done wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
z times x = y
z times y = -x
x times x = 0
x times y = z
 
M Quack said:
z times x = y
z times y = -x
x times x = 0
x times y = z

Ok thanks. I see that I made a mistake in doing that cross product (I did it via a determinant and did the arithmetics too fast, forgetting a term).
I now reach that (\hat z +\hat x) \times (\hat x +\hat y)=\hat y +\hat z -\hat x. But now the denominator is worth (\hat y +\hat x )\cdot (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x )=1-1=0 which can't be right.
 
fluidistic said:
I now reach that (\hat z +\hat x) \times (\hat x +\hat y)=\hat y +\hat z -\hat x. But now the denominator is worth (\hat y +\hat x )\cdot (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x )=1-1=0 which can't be right.

The denominator should be

(\hat y +\hat z )\cdot (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x )

ehild
 
ehild said:
The denominator should be

(\hat y +\hat z )\cdot (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x )

ehild

Ok thanks! That made it, I now reach what I should.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top