Solve Acceleration Due to Gravity on Distant Planet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Malaya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm Waves
AI Thread Summary
To determine the acceleration due to gravity on a distant planet, an astronaut measures the time for a transverse pulse to travel a 1.5 m wire supporting a 0.060-kg ball. The time recorded is 0.098 seconds, and the wire's linear density is 3.1 x 10^-4 kg/m. The calculations initially led to an incorrect force due to a misunderstanding of the velocity formula, where the user mistakenly used multiplication instead of division. Correcting this error is crucial for accurately calculating the gravitational acceleration. Attention to detail in applying formulas is essential for solving physics problems effectively.
Malaya
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To measure the acceleration due to gravity on a distant planet, an astronaut hangs a 0.060-kg ball from the end of a wire. The wire has a length of 1.5 m and a linear density of 3.1 multiplied by 10-4 kg/m. Using electronic equipment, the astronaut measures the time for a transverse pulse to travel the length of the wire and obtains a value of 0.098 s. The mass of the wire is negligible compared to the mass of the ball. Determine the acceleration due to gravity.

m=.06 kg
l=1.5m
linear density= 3.1 multiplied by 10-4 kg/m
t(time)=0.098 s
a=?

Homework Equations


v=d/t
v=√ F/linear density
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



v=dt
v=1.5 x .098
v=.147

v=√ F/linear density
.147=√ F/3.1 multiplied by 10-4 kg/m
.0216=F/3.1 multiplied by 10-4 kg/m
.0216 x 3.1 multiplied by 10-4 kg/m=F
F= 6.699e-6

F=ma
6.699e-6=.06 kg x a
a=1.12e-4

my answer was WRONG!
Why??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, in your Relevant Equations you state that v=d/t (which is correct) but in the first step of your solution you seem to use v=d*t.

It might just be as simple as that.
 
Wow, thank you sooooo much, its funny how little mistakes can make a mess out of a problem!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top