Solve Acceleration Problem: 10 & 20 lb Blocks, Rope Friction Coefficient 0.2

  • Thread starter Thread starter eriklee95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
4 replies · 1K views
eriklee95
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Member warned about using the template.
1. A rope connecting a 10 and 20 lb weight passes over a cylinder. The rope-cylinder friction coefficient is 0.2. Rope mass, cylinder radius not given.2. Solve for downward acceleration of the heavy 20 lb block3. I'm confused because this problem doesn't give a mass for the rope, so I assumed we could neglect friction. Then after writing force/tension equations for both masses and combining them, I got 10.7 ft/s^2 as the answer, which isn't one of the options.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-12-07 at 12.45.31 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-12-07 at 12.45.31 PM.png
    45.9 KB · Views: 584
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Even if the rope is massless the masses hanging from it will produce a force on the cylinder. After all, the cylinder is supporting the mass-rope system.

Friction of a rope wrapped around a fixed cylinder is more complicated than the usual frictional force between flat surfaces. Tensions come into play along with the total angle of the "wrap" of the rope. Has this type of frictional setup been presented to you in your course? If not, look up the "Capstan Equation".
 
gneill said:
Even if the rope is massless the masses hanging from it will produce a force on the cylinder. After all, the cylinder is supporting the mass-rope system.

Friction of a rope wrapped around a fixed cylinder is more complicated than the usual frictional force between flat surfaces. Tensions come into play along with the total angle of the "wrap" of the rope. Has this type of frictional setup been presented to you in your course? If not, look up the "Capstan Equation".
Have you done the calculation? I get a value lower than any of the offered answers.
 
haruspex said:
Have you done the calculation? I get a value lower than any of the offered answers.
I have, and I also get a lower value. Looking at the image it seems that the "20 lb" tag may have changed at some point in order to "refresh" the question. Could be the answer choices were not updated. This can be frustrating for students!
 
gneill said:
it seems that the "20 lb" tag may have changed at some point in order to "refresh" the question.
Well spotted. But I reverse-engineered the mass from the answers and don't get anything encouraging: C)120.8 to 122.4 lb, D) 56 to 56.5 lb, E) 21.2 to 21.3 lb. 120 lb looks hopeful, but it gives 23.5, not 23.6. Other options imply g is being taken as 32.2, which is what I've used.