I Solve Boom Crane Position with Lagrangian Equation | Wind Loading Included

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the position of a suspended mass on a boom crane using the Lagrangian equation, considering factors like hoisting, rotation, and wind loading. The user contemplates representing the system as a double spherical pendulum, with different angles for the boom arm and the mass. They seek confirmation on whether the wind loading should be included on the right-hand side of the Lagrange equation. Concerns are raised about the predictability of the system's motion due to various influences, but the importance of human control over the boom arm is acknowledged. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the need for a robust mathematical approach.
volican
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to model the position of the suspended mass at the end on a boom crane. This is basically a spherical pendulum, however further complicated by the fact that the mass can be hoisted up and down and also the pivot is connected to an arm (boom) which can be rotated up and down and left and right. I would also like to add the effect of wind loading on the mass. Several of these things can be happening at the same time.

Having done some background research I am thinking that I would be best solving this with the Lagrangian equation. Do you think this would be the best approach? I have found some worked examples to derive the equations of motion for a 2DF double pendulum and also a spherical pendulum. I am thinking that the boom arm with the string and mass attached could be represented as a double spherical pendulum, however have the angles for the boom arm different from that of the string and mass? Do you think this makes sense?

I have also found a worked example that shows a simple pendulum where the length gets shorter, I am thinking that this would represent the mass being hoisted and I plan to use the same approach in this model. For the wind loading would I be correct in thinking that this would go on the RHS of the Lagrange equation?

Any suggestions would be most welcome and appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These types of problem usually have no meaningful solution .

Why do you think that the motion of your suspended mass with so many different and random influences acting on it would be predictable ?
 
Thanks for taking the time to write back.

What makes you say that there would be no meaningful solution? Aside from the wind, the boom arm is controlled by the human operator.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top