Solve Driven RL Circuit: Understand KCL & Initial Current

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a driven RL circuit using Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and understanding the initial current conditions. The participant initially calculated the current using KCL but arrived at an incorrect answer of 29.999 A. A second approach yielded a corrected initial current of 27.78 A. The confusion arose regarding the initial current of 30 A and the treatment of the 100 V source, highlighting the importance of considering the polarities of battery connections in circuit analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Knowledge of driven RL circuits
  • Familiarity with exponential decay in electrical circuits
  • Basic circuit analysis techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of KCL in RL circuits
  • Learn about the behavior of inductors in transient analysis
  • Explore the impact of initial conditions on circuit responses
  • Review the principles of voltage sources and their polarities in circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone studying transient responses in RL circuits will benefit from this discussion.

dwn
Messages
165
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Image

Homework Equations



KCL
DRIVEN RL CIRCUIT

The Attempt at a Solution



I got the right answer after trying a different tactic, but I don't understand why it is done this way.

My first approach:

KCL: 100/45 + 60/2 = iL for t < 0

32.22 - (100/45)e^(-45*(0.00001)/0.5) = 29.999 A (NOT THE RIGHT ANSWER)

Second approach:

30 - (100/45)e^(-45*(0.00001)/0.5) = 27.78 A

Why is the initial current 30 A? I know how they got it, but why didn't they use KCL? I mean what is happening to the 100 V source?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-08 at 11.01.28 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2014-05-08 at 11.01.28 PM.jpg
    12.4 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
dwn said:
My first approach:

KCL: 100/45 + 60/2 = iL for t < 0
In forming this equation, have you taken into account the polarities of the battery connections?

In any case, you are making too much out of this question. For an inductor, in the absence of sparks http://physicsforums.bernhardtmediall.netdna-cdn.com/images/icons/icon10.gif current at 0+ = current at 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K