Solve Equation of Continuity Using Schrodinger Equation

opous
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use the Schrodinger Equation to show that

\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\Psi^{*} \Psi) = - \underline{\nabla}. \underline{j}

Homework Equations



\underline{j} = \frac{-i}{2m} \left[\Psi^{*}(\nabla \Psi) - (\nabla \Psi^{*})\Psi]\right

\frac{\partial}{\partial t}n(x,t) = -\underline{\nabla}. \underline{j}(x,t)

n(x,t) = \Psi^{*}(x,t)\Psi (x,t)

I'm not sure how the Schrodinger equation comes into play here... can anyone offer any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the left hand side I see a time derivative, while on the right hand side there is a space derivative (gradient). The Schrödinger equation contains both, so you could use it to go from one to the other (and you might also want to use the complex conjugate of it)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top