Solve Equilibrium Problem: 4 Men Carrying Beam, Calculate Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter yasar1967
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves four men carrying a uniform beam in equilibrium, with two men at the ends and two men positioned inward. The forces acting on the men must balance the weight of the beam, leading to the equation Mg = 2xFno + 2xFni. However, the situation is statically indeterminate, meaning there are multiple valid force distributions that satisfy the equilibrium conditions. Without additional information, such as the specific forces each man exerts, it is impossible to determine unique values for the normal forces. Assuming an even distribution of weight is one possible simplification to approach the problem.
yasar1967
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
1. Four people carry a uniform beam of length L (with mass M) holding it horizontal. Two men hold it at the ends while the remaining two are inward but nevertheless all men are equally apart from each other i.e. if the beam is 4m long the distance from 1st to 2nd is 1m; 2nd to 3rd is 2m and 3rd to 4th is 1m.
Calculate the normal forces acting upon the men.




2. System is in equilibrium, static. general force and torque formulas apply.



3. I assumed due to symmetry, outward Fn forces and inward Fn forces must be equal. Therefore Mg=2xFno+2xFni
The problem is the SAME equation stems from torque formula as well and as I have two identical formulas with two unknowns, I get nowhere.
Where did I go wrong?


 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't go wrong. The problem is statically indeterminate--you just don't have enough information. For example: The two end people can lift 90% of the weight if they want and the two guys in the middle could just pretend to help. That and many other combinations of forces are consistent with the given information.

Of course, you could just assume that the load is evenly distributed.

(Also: If they are evenly spaced and the board is 4m long, they are 4/3 m apart.)
 
thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top