Solve Lagrangian Homework: Bead on Rotating Bicycle Wheel

  • Thread starter Thread starter halukalutalu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
halukalutalu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a bead of mass m moving on a spoke of a rotating bicycle wheel. If there are no forces other than the constraint forces, then find the Lagrangian and the equation of motion in generalised coordinates. What is the possible solution of this motion?

Homework Equations



Lagrange's equation of motion

The Attempt at a Solution



Use cylindrical coordinates for the problem.

Let the origin be at the centre of the wheel and let the wheel lie on the rθ-plane such that θ=0 at the top of the wheel and θ>0 in the clockwise direction.

So, T = 0.5m(\dot{r}^{^2} + r^{2}\dot{\theta}^{2}) and U = mgrcosθ.

So, \frac{∂L}{∂r} - \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{∂L}{∂\dot{r}}) = 0

\Rightarrow (mr\dot{\theta}^{2} - mgcosθ) - m\ddot{r} = 0

\Rightarrow \ddot{r} = r\dot{\theta}^{2} - gcosθ

and \frac{∂L}{∂θ} - \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{∂L}{∂\dot{θ}}) = 0

\Rightarrow (-mgrsinθ) - mr^{2}\ddot{θ} = 0

\Rightarrow \ddot{θ} = - \frac{g}{r}sinθ

Do you think I've got the equations of motion right?

I have no idea how to work out the possible solution of the motion. Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
halukalutalu said:

Homework Statement



Consider a bead of mass m moving on a spoke of a rotating bicycle wheel. If there are no forces other than the constraint forces, then find the Lagrangian and the equation of motion in generalised coordinates. What is the possible solution of this motion?


Homework Equations



Lagrange's equation of motion

The Attempt at a Solution



Use cylindrical coordinates for the problem.

Let the origin be at the centre of the wheel and let the wheel lie on the rθ-plane such that θ=0 at the top of the wheel and θ>0 in the clockwise direction.

So, T = 0.5m(\dot{r}^{^2} + r^{2}\dot{\theta}^{2}) and U = mgrcosθ.

So, \frac{∂L}{∂r} - \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{∂L}{∂\dot{r}}) = 0

\Rightarrow (mr\dot{\theta}^{2} - mgcosθ) - m\ddot{r} = 0

\Rightarrow \ddot{r} = r\dot{\theta}^{2} - gcosθ

and \frac{∂L}{∂θ} - \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{∂L}{∂\dot{θ}}) = 0

\Rightarrow (-mgrsinθ) - mr^{2}\ddot{θ} = 0

\Rightarrow \ddot{θ} = - \frac{g}{r}sinθ

Do you think I've got the equations of motion right?

I have no idea how to work out the possible solution of the motion. Thoughts?

The last one is not correct. Take care whit the time derivative.

ehild
 
To be honest, I don't see how I've got things wrong with the time derivative. Of course, \dot{θ} differentiated wrt time becomes \ddot{θ}, right?

Also, isn't r constrained to be smaller than the radius of the wheel. Doesn't this have an effect on the solution?
 
\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{∂L}{∂\dot{θ}}) = \frac{d}{dt}(mr^2\dot{θ})=2mr\dot r\dot {θ}+mr^2 \ddot {θ}

You ignored the time dependence of r.

The text of the problem is not clear.

Does that wheel rotate in the horizontal or in the vertical plane? mg is an outside force, not force of constraint.

Is there something making the wheel rotate with a given angular speed, or does the wheel rote freely about a fixed axis?

I think you can assume the radius of the wheel arbitrary long.

ehild
 
ehild said:
\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{∂L}{∂\dot{θ}}) = \frac{d}{dt}(mr^2\dot{θ})=2mr\dot r\dot {θ}+mr^2 \ddot {θ}

You ignored the time dependence of r.

Thanks for the pointer. :)

ehild said:
The text of the problem is not clear.<br /> <br /> Does that wheel rotate in the horizontal or in the vertical plane? mg is an outside force, not force of constraint. <br /> <br /> Is there something making the wheel rotate with a given angular speed, or does the wheel rote freely about a fixed axis? <br /> <br /> I think you can assume the radius of the wheel arbitrary long. <br /> <br /> ehild
<br /> <br /> I think the wheel rotates in the horizontal plane because there are no forces apart from the given force of constraint and because the force of gravity is not a force of constraint. What do you think? Isn&#039;t this also why we can safely say that the wheel rotates freely?<br /> <br /> So, if we assume that the radius of the wheel is arbitrarily large, would you say that under those assumptions, my solution is correct?
 
What is your solution?

If the wheel is free to rotate, it is part of the system. You have to include it into the Lagrangian.

Are you sure you copied the problem correctly?

How do you include the constraint?

ehild
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top