Solve Resistance Problem: Circuit Total Resistance

AI Thread Summary
To solve for the total resistance of the circuit, clarity on the circuit diagram and the specific points between which resistance is measured is essential. The initial diagram lacks necessary details, including the configuration of nodes and potential short circuits. Once these issues are addressed, the total resistance can be calculated by simplifying the circuit, potentially using delta-Y transformations. The discussion suggests that the total resistance could be around 2.4 ohms when modeled correctly. Accurate measurements may require practical tools like precision resistors and an ohmmeter.
Pwease
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can someone please give me insight on how to solve for the total resistance of this circuit? Thank you

Homework Equations


11660047_10203142568884265_713498334_o.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't.
1. the picture does not show a circuit.
2. the picture does not show the two points that the resistance is to be taken between.
3. there appears to be a short-circuit between the left and right-most extreme nodes.

Once the above issues are sorted out - you will find the total resistance by simplifying the circuit. It can help to redraw it.
 
11660047_10203142568884265_713498334_o.jpg


Thank you for the scrutiny. Is this satisfactory now? I am sorry I there are still errors to tend to in the diagram, I hope I was able to convey enough information this time

Total resistance between nodes A and B
 
Last edited:
I don't see any symmetry that would help you out here so it seems to me you'll just have to do a ton of delta-Y transforms and simplify the circuit bit by bit. Looks to conceptually trivial but VERY messy to actually carry out.
 
I suggest a box of assorted precision-resistors and a good ohmmeter.
 
I'm tempted to say "about 2 ohms".

There is a 1 and a 2 "in series" between a and b with mostly higher values "in parallel".

If you model it as a 1+2 in parallel with a 3+4+5 you get about 2.4 Ohms.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top